主题:请教关于美国大萧条时间对老兵讨薪事件的镇压 -- krone
上次和系里的一个小印聊天,一不小心涉及到了政治。其实我与老外和台湾同学相处时一般都不主动牵扯到政治讨论,因为大多数时候这是屁股决定脑袋的问题。都已经这么大了,因为教育,种族,文化的影响,对于事物的看法已经根深蒂固。因此谁也说服不了谁,最后还伤了和气。但是涉及到了就不能不尽力解释,消除误解。我和小印恰好聊到了六四事件,当然在他们口中是天安门大屠杀。我首先肯定了学生出发点是好的,是爱国的,但是方式不对,以致最后和政府产生了暴力对抗。在政府宣布戒严的情况下,继续对抗下去产生最后的结果学生责任更大。然后我举了美国在大萧条时间对老兵讨薪的镇压,并特别强调了坦克车的使用(因为大家都对那个栏坦克的例子耳熟能详)。他当时表示不信。于是就上喂鸡看。
In July 1932, Patton served under Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur, as a major leading 600 troops, including the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment, in an action to disperse the protesting veterans known as the "Bonus Army" in Washington, DC. MacArthur ordered the troops to advance on the protesters with tear gas and bayonets. At one point, when the protesters resisted with bricks and curses, Patton led the last mounted charge of the U.S. Cavalry. One of the veterans rousted by the cavalry was Joe Angelo, who had won the Distinguished Service Cross in 1918 for saving Patton's life.
可惜这里没有提到坦克,显得我好象在说谎。晕,我记得李敖在北京演讲还举了这个例子的。还出示了当时纽约时报的报道(含图片)佐证。只好放狗再找,于是找到
On July 28, 1932, protesters known as the "Bonus Army," or "Bonus Expeditionary Forces (B.E.F.)," who had gathered in the nation's capital to demand an immediate lump-sum payment of pension funds (benefits) for their military service during World War I, were confronted by Federal troops (cavalry, machine-gunners, and infantry) following President Herbert Hoover's orders to evacuate. (While Congress had approved the payment in 1924, the bonus was not payable until 1945.) The presence of the Bonus Army was a continuing embarrassment and source of difficulty for Hoover. He sent in troops under the command of Brigadier Perry L. Miles and General Douglas MacArthur. The veterans faced tear-gas bombs, bayonets, and tanks. Riots erupted and the veterans eventually disbanded.
坦克总算看到了,但是还是放在最后。此外都没有涉及到伤亡人数,而配的图片也感觉一团和气,没什么价值。
因此肯请哪位老大能提供一些更具体的参考资料,最好是英文的。多谢!
本帖一共被 3 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂请教关于美国大萧条时间对老兵讨薪事件的镇压
🙂没重用坦克很正常,坦克是在后来德军手里才被确立了陆战之王的身份 scorpioking 字0 2007-12-03 07:52:40
🙂说的是。 1 金色阳光 字64 2007-12-02 20:54:20
🙂-- 系统屏蔽 --。
🙂请理性讨论。多论事,少论人. 1 瓦斯 字167 2007-12-05 00:17:04
🙂-- 系统屏蔽 --。
🙂对等原则就行 2 瓦斯 字170 2007-12-05 05:14:16
🙂-- 系统屏蔽 --。