五千年(敝帚自珍)

主题:[原创]六:土耳其-希望在左梦想在右,向着希望与梦想飞奔(上) -- 葡萄

共:💬92 🌺214
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 同意你的理论,但是不同意你对西方“文明”的解读

至少在西方文明之间的“嗜血”不能再发生已成为共识。

1。西方国家不是不“嗜血”,而是嗜“看不见的血”。

http://mrspickles.wordpress.com/2007/04/23/kurt-nimmo-bill-clinton-ambassador-of-death/

In 1996, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization, “567,000 Iraqi children had died as a direct consequence of economic sanctions,” and the following year UNICEF reported “that 4,500 Iraqi children under five were dying every month as a result of sanctions—induced starvation and disease.”

注:那个95年的联合国调查报告,已经不在其网站上,不过根据97年的报告

The Mission followed a similar FAO/WFP assessment in 1995 and based its evaluation on discussions with Government Ministries and Departments, UN System Organizations, bilateral agencies and NGOs and on field visits throughout the country.

The imposition of UN sanctions in August 1990 have, however, significantly constrained Iraq’s ability to earn foreign currency needed to import sufficient quantities of food to meet needs. As a consequence, food shortages and malnutrition became progressively severe and chronic in the 1990s.

2。西方不是不嗜血,是嗜其他人的血。反观过去50年,唯一挑起战端的是什么国家?他们在谁的土地上打战?死的是谁的人民?

3。西方国家间不相互打战并不是他们的精神文明进步或者是从以往的教训中吸取了什么教训,而是他们觉得不划算。世界上大把弱势国家,为什么我们要窝里反?

文明要怎么发展?就是只有世界上不同的国家,文化,都有相对的实力,和平变成不可不为的情况下,才能谈文明发展。否则这个世界上只要还有强弱之别,都会是野蛮的。

在中国还未能和美国平起平坐时宣传和平文明论,那是要中国亡国啊(夸张了,但是意思在那里。)

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河