主题:【文摘】Life杂志里的朝鲜战争(1)敌人的面孔 -- pxpxpx
RUSSELL : "As to the extension of the war, the adoption of the MacArthur Plan . . . What do you think ... of that plan?"
MARSHALL: "I think the extension of the conflict would not be profitable . . . for a number of reasons."
Profit & Loss. Marshall ticked off the Administration's rejoinder to the MacArthur proposals: bombing of Manchurian bases or of the Chinese mainland would not cripple the enemy as much as Mac-Arthur believes, because, for one thing, life is cheap in China; a naval blockade would involve the U.S. with Russian ships, would probably "leak like a sieve," and would not shut off the main Chinese supplies, coming by land from Russia; the value of Chiang Kai-shek's troops on Formosa in any expedition against the Reds is negligible. "I do not believe . . . the result would be commensurate with the effort that we would have to make."
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,859150-1,00.html
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
😄那还没到时候,现在,我可以做梦也可以YY。 寒冷未必在冬天 字0 2009-03-31 02:49:06
🙂从否定烈士入手引申到全面否定毛泽东,这一点十分为人所不齿 3 黄河故人 字0 2009-03-20 23:41:18
🙂呵呵,美国人这么高尚?就因为这个才没有轰炸的? 10 hunter1 字231 2009-03-20 17:53:16
🙂没人说美国人高尚,我想你是误会了,下面是原文
🙂英美国家打仗精明算计是有传统的,但也要承认别样的态度 也要崛起 字188 2009-03-24 16:35:22
🙂那是我理解错了,道歉 20 hunter1 字925 2009-03-21 03:38:33