主题:猪八戒别妄想娶林志玲 -- Irene王
The Re-Examination Clause applies not only to federal courts, but also to "a case tried before a jury in a state court and brought to the Supreme Court on appeal."[17]
As common law provided, the judge could set aside (or nullify) a jury verdict when the judge decided that the verdict was contrary to the evidence or the law. Common law precluded the judge from himself entering a verdict; a new trial, with a new jury, was the only course permissible. In Slocum v. New York Insurance Co. (1913), the Supreme Court upheld this rule. Later cases have undermined Slocum, but generally only when the evidence is overwhelming, or if a specific law provides narrow guidelines by which there can be no reasonable question as to the required outcome, may the court enter "judgment as a matter of law" or otherwise set aside the jury's findings.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 5 层
🙂看来你现在知道陪审团的判决是终审了,但对宪法的产生还不服 3 PBS 字750 2012-04-05 19:57:46
🙂陪审团的判决不是终审,法官可以予以修正甚至推翻 迅哥 字209 2012-04-05 20:36:29
🙂你又来对宪法修正案第7条进行违宪解释了 3 PBS 字514 2012-04-05 21:26:05
🙂呵呵,很可惜,法律是由精英而不是臭皮匠来解释的
🙂你用这一段怎么也解释不了决定辛普森无罪的事实 PBS 字34 2012-04-05 23:37:21
🙂这一段是解释第七修正案,而非辛普森案 1 迅哥 字66 2012-04-05 23:53:49
🙂非也 4 PBS 字7075 2012-04-07 18:08:25
🙂只有刑事审判要求一致 通过。民事案只要求多数通过。不过挑 笼中猪 字22 2012-04-05 13:55:13