主题:羽联新赛制的惨败给我的警示 -- 哈酷
看看外国淫民评论这个规则的:subjectivity
Justin Murray Wrote:
Perfectly fine strategy. If you introduce penalties for "not playing your hardest", that creates too much subjectivity as we have no standards on what "hardest" means. This is done in sports all the time. NFL teams that secure home field advantage for the playoffs put their second and third string players in the final games. World Cup teams that secure a spot in the elimination round will back off in the final game of group play to avoid wasting energy.
If the organizers don't like the behavior, don't have group play or round robin stages and use the single elimination format.
链接:http://online.wsj.com/community/groups/asias-question-day-783/topics/fair-athletes-try-lose-order
下面有个回复我很喜欢:
Perfectly fine strategy and is the right thing to do in this case.
If the pair wins, they don't gain anything but they hurt their country's interests. Who made such stupid rules?
全的,看香山居士的帖子。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂制定赛制,安排玩家/选手间的竞争,完全一样 3 哈酷 字154 2012-08-02 02:18:31
🙂开发游戏的程序员不具备羽联那样的权威! 九霄环珮 字0 2012-08-02 03:08:40
🙂再说一遍 1 行者孙 字74 2012-08-02 01:58:15
🙂那个规则就是个主观判断,相当于说你行你就行,不行也行。
🙂这个你说得一点不错 2 行者孙 字176 2012-08-02 02:49:18
🙂可惜,主观判断的东西什么都可以是,就是不是规则!规则必须 4 知其何休 字874 2012-08-02 03:28:20
🙂您又说对了 2 行者孙 字272 2012-08-02 03:38:28
🙂羽联逼运动员当耍猴的猴子,运动员反抗了,就这么简单。 5 知其何休 字306 2012-08-02 03:46:59