主题：【原创】有一种骗局叫做方舟子--揭穿方舟子的伪装 -- 思想的行者
1月29日，方舟子在为MDPI洗地时说：
I don’t see any major problems with this publisher. It appears that they are open access but don’t charge article processing fees at...】
但实际上，方舟子引用的Jeffrey Beall的这段话是Jeffrey Beall在应一位读者的要求评价另一家出版商的：
May 17, 2013 at 5:15 AM
。。。
Now tell me what do you think about these journals, i am evaluating them nowadays: jbsq.org and http://www.mecs-press.org/journals.html
Reply
Jeffrey Beall says:
May 18, 2013 at 3:14 PM
I don’t see any major problems with this publisher. It appears that they are open access but don’t charge article processing fees at this time. I did see a couple small examples of plagiarism and self-plagiarism. The publisher requires copyright transfer. The papers bear a copyright statement but are open access. I will not be adding this publisher to my list at this time. It looks like they are putting in much effort to operate professionally.
更可恶的是，Beall的这段话是他在去年五月的一篇文章《More Controversy Over Open-Access Publisher MDPI》后面的评论，当时MDPI已经引起了Beall的注意。
方舟子这招移花接木，显然是恶意造假。但他信手拈来浑然天成，轻而易举就蒙骗了大多数人。
这个时候的方舟子显然认为Jeffrey Beall是学术期刊打假的专家，不惜伪造他的言论，来吓唬别人。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 11 层
🙂这个社会有几个无罪的？ 7 tojinge 字388 2014-02-15 20:51:02
🙂你确定方舟子的职业是打假而不是造假？ 思想的行者 字174 2014-02-16 04:36:57
🙂我没看出他有＂故意＂造假 1 废话多多 字295 2014-02-23 07:35:44
🙂提供一个方舟子故意造假的例子
🙂你管他动机是啥？！ 6 tojinge 字404 2014-02-16 05:46:10
🙂方舟子在你眼里就是一条狗 似曾相识 字48 2014-02-19 10:34:39
🙂为什么要在乎是不是狗呢？ 2 废话多多 字181 2014-02-23 07:47:29
🙂方六亲不认？？？你是图样图森破 似曾相识 字271 2014-02-23 08:00:24