主题:【原创】这才是玩钱的行家:写在QE结束之后 -- maturedpeach
some are just theorists, who live and research in their perfect world. I once saw one federal reserve officer who does not even know that America has personal income tax and asked a question about why tax is even an consideration in one presenter's model.
Majority of the academics are just good researchers and teachers.
A small percentage of academics are truly smart: not only academically smart, but also street smart in terms of knowing how to apply their expertise in real world and know how to work with different people. Ben is one of those people.
中国的书生不行: Confuscius' books are books ON MORALs, not books on science. China's 书生, esp., before science/physics/chemistry/math were introduced into China, were trained not based on scientific methodologies, so the whole framework of knowledge was built upon moral arguments, not logic and empirical tests.
One exception is Charles Lee at Cornell University. But he is trained by the U.S. system despite his Taiwan/Chinese cultural background.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂楼下月下说出了一半道理,但是只是体制内的问题 3 原手 字451 2014-11-29 14:21:41
🙂不同意这观点,体制内外的人才各有所长,各有所短 渔儿漂漂 字196 2014-11-30 01:05:13
🙂别听楼下瞎胡说。我觉得主要就是通道没有彻底打通 月下 字482 2014-11-26 00:59:49
🙂there are 2 kinds of 美国的学术精英
🙂中国书生那段不全部认同 7 范进中举 字857 2014-11-26 20:03:14
🙂因为没有理想 3 tint 字423 2014-12-03 10:51:42
🙂科学 不能 被证明, 只可以证伪 6 parishg 字590 2014-11-28 03:12:37
🙂KarI Popper的哲学与马列相悖,太多人不了解他了 过堂风 字0 2014-12-06 21:51:35