主题:【原创】死亡起源 The Origin of Death -- az09
我也曾随后发表了一篇文章论证Wolfe-Simon文章中的错误。
最近有篇文章回顾了“砷基生物”这一乌龙争论暴露的评审漏洞。
Social Media, Peer Review, and Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) in Chemistry: Trends, Pitfalls, and Promises。
外链出处。
Differing Standards of Scientific Evidence。
Case summary: Because of its potential implications for the very definition of life, the field of astrobiology is one that engages both the research community’s attention and the public’s imagination. This case study deals with the announcement of the discovery of a bacterium that purportedly replaces the essential life element phosphorus with arsenic for its survival; if true the finding would be paradigm-changing. However, multiple problems with both the study and its revelation through press conference became apparent almost immediately after the announcement. The initial criticism was followed by a novel experiment on a blog seeking to duplicate the results; this experiment along with several others found fundamental flaws with the findings. The case illustrates both the perils and benefits of Internet-based, citizen-enabled peer review as well as citizen science. It also raises interesting questions about the modalities of peer review in the age of interdisciplinary research and the great potential of citizen-based analysis in favorably augmenting these modalities。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂我们与草履虫当然同宗啦,所有真核细胞生命都同宗啊 迷惑不解 字0 2016-04-26 04:21:22
🙂您提的问题好大。呵呵。 2 az09 字911 2016-04-15 20:43:37
🙂砷基生物应该是已经被证伪 4 明雪积 字1833 2016-04-16 11:13:57
🙂Wolfe-Simon文章有很多错误,暴露了评审的漏洞
🙂呵呵,难道又是一个小保方晴子? 4 az09 字1418 2016-04-17 15:15:19
😁呀,把我想做的科普讲了,很好,继续 1 关中农民 字0 2016-04-14 19:04:06
🙂您是癌症专家,可以写长贴的,期待中....... 2 az09 字135 2016-04-15 10:44:06
😁谢谢好文章,脑洞大开啊。看来可以成立永生教了 8 钓者任公子 字544 2016-04-09 03:01:58