主题：【衲记包子】超心理学家驳斥反伪斗士魔术师兰迪 -- 衲子
nature vol. 319 p444 6 Feb. 1986
Remote viewing exposed
....
Considering the importance for the remote viewing hypothesis of adequate cue removal, Tart's failure to perform this basic task seems beyond comprehension. As previously concluded (2), remote viewing has not been demostrated in the experiments conducted by Puthoff and Targ, only the repeated failure of the investigators to remove sensory cues.
David Marks
Christopher Scott
...
2.Marks, D. & Kammann, R. Nature 274, 680-681 (1978)
...
- 相关回复 上下关系8
😭【链接】检验怀疑论者---怀疑地看待詹姆斯.兰迪 衲子 字695 2006-01-08 07:17:36
其实不必把1974年的文章拿出来，也不必用“CIA" AK545 字141 2006-01-08 05:24:09
😭那篇Nature文章作者背景:两人皆为物理学家.Targ是调频激光 衲子 字310 2006-01-08 05:52:06
恩，但是nature上有业内人士的看法吧
嗯,所以结论应该是:现在学界对"遥视"有争议,主流持反对态度 衲子 字0 2006-01-08 06:06:55
你可以找找puthoff和tart对Marks和Scott 1986年的回应么 octogenarian 字80 2006-01-08 06:21:49
😭后来有人成功地复制了Puthoff的实验. David Marks有评论 衲子 字1347 2006-01-08 07:07:32
😭没找到, 但找到一个搞动物心灵感应的生物学家答复Marks 衲子 字209 2006-01-08 07:00:05