主题：【原创】志愿军战士关崇贵到底击落了谁？ -- daharry
送花赞扬。注：送花、宝推可能得宝 关闭
送花成功，可取消。有效送花赞扬。感谢：作者获得通宝一枚。
参数变化，作者，声望:1；铢钱:16。你，乐善:1；铢钱:-1。本帖花:1
KORWALD Loss Incident Summary
Date of Loss: 510224
Tail Number: 49-1860
Aircraft Type: F-80C
Wing or Group: 8th Ftr-Bmbr Gp
Circumstances of Loss: Operational loss, possible engine failure, crash landed
另外根据这篇访谈：
His second victory was on the 23rd (!) of February 1951 (Red Army Day) over an F-80, confirmed by the American side. In this engagement Ovsyannikov seriously damaged one F-80. This was F-80 No. 49-1860 from the 8th Fighter Bomber Wing. Though it flew back to its base, it was destroyed during landing. Naturally, the Americans recorded this loss as “non-battle,” the aircraft ostensibly having been destroyed “for technical reasons.” In fact, it landed in damaged condition and during the landing suffered a catastrophic accident.
尾号49-1860的F-80C被苏联飞行员Ovsyannikov击伤，飞回机场迫降失败坠毁，只是在日期上差一天，说是23日，不是24日。
所以，关崇贵击落的确实是97008号F4U-4。
日期本来是死的，一般人理所当然地相信自己方面的统计。但令人难以理解的是怎么会出现同一架飞机在不同日期受损呢？美国方面以坠毁这种理由掩盖了该机（以及许许多多其他F-86)空战受损的事实。这说明，在使用美国方面的资料时也应及其慎重。
谢谢你提供的进一步资料。以后会在这方面经常向老大求助。
关崇贵的事我在国内正设法找42军的人核实细节，但愿能发现点线索。
米帝哪怕下了战场一秒钟就死，也不算战死的
KORWALD数据库并非是什么权威，原作者自己也承认遗漏甚多。拿着棒槌当针认不可取...
当然有总比没有强，这方面中文资料还有更多的路要走。