主题:【原创】在西西河“求实” -- landlord
结论确实未必那么明显
http://mesharpe.metapress.com/app/home/contribution.asp?referrer=parent&backto=issue,3,7;journal,4,39;linkingpublicationresults,1:110901,1
例如这篇文章, 用健康资源每人占有量的基尼系数来衡量卫生支出公平性, 得出结论是自1970年代以来一直在改善, 也就是说现在比赤脚医生的年代这一点反而做得更好. 摘要如下:
Most economics literature holds that the disparity in income and health resource allocation between China's urban and rural areas has been increasing since the beginning of the reform period in 1978. This paper argues, contrary to the conventional view, that the real gap in health resources allocation between China's urban and rural areas, as measured by the Gini coefficient, has been shrinking during the reform period. The urban-rural disparity is now smaller than that in the 1970s, when the "barefoot doctor" system provided broad basic medical service in rural areas. The better health resources available in rural China have reduced the urban-rural disparity in health conditions such as infant mortality.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂花“禁不住手指大动” 1 老拙 字30 2009-06-10 17:26:48
🙂强烈支持! 1 Ruadong 字67 2009-06-10 17:19:37
🙂埋花等宝! 1 山远空寒 字0 2009-06-10 16:51:29
🙂有关于卫生支出的平等性
🙂给喜欢打破砂锅问到底的地主上花 1 燕庐敕 字24 2009-06-10 16:39:59
🙂我看的越多越不敢说话 1 肯定没有被注册 字64 2009-06-10 15:30:32