主题:【原创】中国高速铁道“1000亿元”的投标争论 -- xixi
About question 2, the cost of the Technology Transferring. I am still doubting that 4-5 billion will be spended on Tech Transferring. About this, we can get more information if we know how much JR东日本 spended on its Tech research, and how much “光基铁道” will pay JR东日本 for Tech Transferring. And the case in Taiwan might help also. But I could not find enough data till now. (Hope somebody can hlep!)
Your Microsoft expamle, I think, will not apply here. Anything gets its reasonable price, if buyer would like to pay. I think these 4-5 billion is too much high---How much did Chinese government spend on Chinese own research? If they can invest these 4-5 billion in our own research, I think Chinese people can do it, right? even do not need to mention the money paid to France and Canada for the Tech!
About question 3.
From the political perspective, China should not consider Japanese companies at all. right? Even Germany is better.
u said:'法国人随时可能破产,而日本有随时可能跟我们翻脸."
Actually, from the political viewpoint, if Frech companies broke down, there would nothing important; but If Japanese government will break up with China anytime, why should China pay so much to buy goods from them?
"你用二百五十亿大洋,就买一家的技术过来,你是不是觉得更亏?"
But from the beginning, we dont need to pay that much. If we buy tech from one company only, like Frech company, or even from our own copany, why should we pay that much for duplicate tech?
"如果对这三种技术的消化能在三五年内完成,今后国内铁路还有七万公里,"
I think, Japanese will play their tradtional tricks to control the business all over China. I dont think Chinese comanies can get rid of the control of Jpanese, to operate seperately. Take the history into consideration, u will not be surpprised. Japanese have never transferred the advanced tech to China,
"欧亚大陆还有更大的市场,加上我们的造价优势,相信可以在未来二十年里够吃的。"
To my opinion, this is a dream.
Thanks again for your reply.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
有道理。克兄,京沪高铁如抛开政治因素,是否是用日本的较好? iceberg 字0 2004-10-22 20:26:19
当然不是唯一的选择。不过是个重要的选择 你克我服 字435 2004-10-23 06:58:56
thank you. iceberg 字0 2004-10-23 11:51:17
Thanks for ur reply. But I can not agree with u.
🙂对中国铁路,兄台还是应该多了解了解再说,呵呵 你克我服 字3883 2004-10-23 07:42:19
thanks a lot. snowbean 字87 2004-10-23 14:43:02
多谢服兄,建议顺便补充到兄台那篇关于高铁的精华里面吧。 龙城飞将 字0 2004-10-22 05:34:09
才发现,标题里面这个“1000亿元”,实在没有任何证据 你克我服 字340 2004-10-18 05:58:24