主题：美军朝鲜战争中生物武器库一览（一） -- 石千里

并不就代表，美军没有go ahead with the plan。 并不代表没有行动，最终是看事实的证据。

而且，你确定你看了全文吗？文志忠可也说了plausible deniability，我想你英语这么好，不用我解释了吧?

而且，你是引用他的文章中的一段作为你的论点，而他的论证结果偏偏不是支持你的所谓：美国没有细菌战的观点。

经过他的论证，他最后的总结可是：

Conclusion

The disappointment expressed by the U.S. military leadership in the progress of their biological warfare program by 1953 is consistent with Chinese reports of the results of what they took to be an experimental use of biological weapons in China and Korea. The experiments were unsuccessful in starting large-scale epidemics in the battle zone or along the enemy's transportation lines. The official Chinese history of the Korean War states that the Chinese army suffered less than 400 casualties from the biological weapons attacks in 1952. This report, if accurate, tends to confirm the American feelings of disappointment with their efforts. Chinese accounts give many examples of civilian casualties as the result of what were considered to be germ war attacks on the general populace but no over-all figures.

While American scientists and military engineers had been unable to achieve a lethal, easily disseminated, epidemic producing germ agent for use in battlefield conditions, the evidence suggests that for over one and a half years the US tried to do just that and still denies it. This is a black hole in US military history.

外链出处