主题:裁判---2010世界杯最大一根搅屎棍 -- 四处晃荡
62年那一屆,巴西超強,雖然黑哨下,仍能技術擊倒意大利。
到66年那一屆。巴西最終都敵不過黑哨放任他對手的殺傷戰略而敗下陣來。至於英德決賽英國的第3 球。更是爭論的焦點。
國際足協前會長Havelange,更坦承66及74年那兩屆的冠軍是早已決定的了。
The 1966 World Cup held in England has been the centre of a number of conspiracy theories over the years. These include England’s quarter final victory over Argentina when the hosts won 1-0 after the South Americans had seen their captain Antonio Rattin controversially handed a straight red card for arguing with the referee.
It has been claimed that there was a plot for England to win the World Cup, and the referee from this game was German, while the official in Germany’s quarter final win over Uruguay was English. The controversy continued in the final with Geoff Hurst’s famous ‘was it over the line?’ goal.
Joao Havelange, who was FIFA President from 1974 until 1998 is certain to have further fuelled these conspiracy theories by openly stating that the 1966 and ’74 World Cups were fixed.
"In the three matches that the Brazilian national team played in 1966, of the three referees and six linesmen, seven were British and two were Germans," Havelange told Folha de Sao Paulo.
"Brazil went out, Pele ‘exited’ through injury [following some rough defensive play], and England and Germany entered into the final, just as the Englishman Sir Stanley Rous, who was the President of FIFA at the time, had wanted.
"In Germany in 1974 the same thing happened. During the Brazil-Holland match, the referee was German, we lost 2-0 and Germany won the title," said Havelange.
"We were the best in the world, and had the same team that had won the World Cup in 1962 in Chile and 1970 in Mexico, but it was planned for the host countries to win.”
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂伤人? raphsody 字102 2010-07-12 00:20:35
🙂没印象是哪个人了 红茶 字156 2010-07-12 14:01:37
🙂什么是“肯定不是应该有的动作” raphsody 字182 2010-07-12 23:23:37
🙂黑哨是世界盃的傳統!!
🙂这届尤甚 艾义 字0 2010-07-11 18:36:30
🙂那个犯规该吃红牌,但比赛就没悬念了 1 PBS 字138 2010-07-11 15:23:01
🙂这就是FIFA怕改革的根本原因 四处晃荡 字128 2010-07-11 15:28:44
🙂也不能完全这么说 1 李禾平 字42 2010-07-11 14:57:20