主题:cited article, 中国除了不断地说“不”之外 -- parishg
Actually, I realize that even domestic Chinese officials can not give specific description of this term.
Washginton Consenus is the propaganded term of the Republican wing of free market believers. It works for US to some extent, but was a disaster for Asia in 1990s.
You are talking about delinking money and wealth. How do you think Feds like that idea?
-- you did misunderstand how the system works. It has nothing to do with the decoupling between money and wealth. For Fed Reserve, it is merely a Dr/Cr. adjustment to reduce outstanding currency.
Oh, BTW, I do not think China elites will fundamentally reform the current system. The financial elites of US and China are much much closer than you wish them to be. The end result will be merely a great bargain between the two sides.
For them, nationality does not mean much, as well as national loyalty. You will understand what I mean 10 years later.
Let's wait and see the "history" of the next 10 years.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂Yeah, reasonable 1 Levelworm 字257 2011-11-27 16:30:50
🙂不看立场,这篇对美国思路的分析不错 鹄釉扉 字14 2010-11-15 16:54:27
🙂I am no experty in economy 16 晨枫 字2593 2010-11-14 08:36:50
🙂what is Beijing Consensus?
🙂也许你说得对 Levelworm 字158 2011-11-27 14:36:53
🙂北京共识也是外国人总结的吧 四处张望 字172 2010-11-17 02:36:16
🙂问题在于需要一个普世的玩意 1 Levelworm 字232 2011-11-27 14:43:08
🙂Beijing consensus is also a 6 晨枫 字528 2010-11-14 09:21:06