主题：青山遮不住，大江东流去——转基因技术的光大和反转派的崩溃 -- 黑岛人

共:💬415 🌺1876 🌵187

老大河待整

全看分页树展 · 主题跟帖

复这位罗教主，我对和您辩论毫无兴趣

家园

又来一个一致性看法了？

这次你代表美国医学界了？

请问你看了多少篇关于美国人肥胖的论文呢？

再次退一步，就算是美国医学界的一致意见，就没有一点错的可能性了？

引发肥胖的因素很多，你就确定只有一种，你真是强大啊。

我说的中国需要食品救助的人口比美国少--我已经说了我所指的贫困是指需要食品救济的人口这个意思，关于美国需要食品救济的人口的数量可以查询美国农业部网站

例如这是2009年的调查报告

Economic Research Report No. (ERR-108) 68 pp, November 2010

Eighty-five percent of American households were food secure throughout the entire year in 2009, meaning that they had access at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life for all household members. The remaining households (14.7 percent) were food insecure at least some time during the year, including 5.7 percent with very low food security. In households with very low food security, the food intake of one or more household members was reduced and their eating patterns were disrupted at times during the year because the household lacked money and other resources for food. Prevalence rates of food insecurity and very low food security were essentially unchanged from 14.6 percent and 5.7 percent, respectively, in 2008, and remained at the highest recorded levels since 1995, when the first national food security survey was conducted. The typical food-secure household spent 33 percent more on food than the typical food-insecure household of the same size and household composition. Fifty-seven percent of all food-insecure households participated in one or more of the three largest Federal food and nutrition assistance programs during the month prior to the 2009 survey.

外链出处

你对与我辩论不感兴趣，我对与你辩论倒是很感兴趣呢，我特别想看看你是怎么使用诸如商业失败这样的字眼来解释一项商业项目的失败的原因的

想想看你是怎么使用诸如“大江东流去”等等华丽的文学词汇呢，可以跟您学一学文学表达手段啊

当然了，你前面指出的确实是我的一个打字错误，看到您写得那么流畅，想像您学习，打字快了些，就出错了

纠正一下啊

那句话应该修改为

美国的转基因粮食有没有产生问题？美国人普遍的肥胖症与美国人推广种植的转基因粮食有没有关系？

我相信您这样具备高度科学素养的常常可以站在一个学科的高度，可以对包括很多纷争的整个生物学界做出权威性的评判的人是不会纠结于对方的一两个打字错误的是吧？

即使美国顶级的权贵也不能避免自己食用到转基因食品。

这下你貌似改口了，你前面说的是

从美国总统、华尔街大亨到比尔盖茨、巴菲特，这些世界最顶级的权贵们还真是一个都跑不了的吃着转基因食品呢。

你前面说的那段话貌似那些“世界级权贵”们是很乐意于吃转基因食品的是吧，所以你才用来把那作为支持转基因的证据。