五千年(敝帚自珍)

主题:猪八戒别妄想娶林志玲 -- Irene王

共:💬224 🌺528 🌵11
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 是不太熟悉,需要么

我几年前读过此案的判决书.没有深刻的印象.这是一个普通的监护纠纷案件,庭审的判决后来被推翻了。美国离婚的家庭多,这样的案子很多,类似的案件我读过不下二三十个.您是门外汉(layperson),见了一个就被唬住了.

美国打官司打的就是程序,比起庭审之前的花销,庭审的费用基本是可以忽略的。我说美国的司法系统花银子,可没说在您身上花银子.

随便一例,在马里兰州死刑案件(全是陪审团审的)的花费如下,黑体字是所有审判的花费。如果象您想像的那样陪审团制是便宜的,那怎么会花那么多钱呢?

An average capital-eligible case in which the death sentence was not sought costs Maryland taxpayers more than $1.1 million over the life of the case - $870,000 in prison costs and $250,000 in adjudication costs.

§ An average capital-eligible case with a death notice costs the taxpayers of Maryland about $1.8 million. In other words, each case with a death notice filing costs $670,000 more than a no-death-notice case. Current and forecasted prison costs are about the same ($950,000 per case), but adjudication costs are more than three times greater ($850,000 per case) than in no-death-notice cases.

§ A capital-eligible case that results in a death sentence adds another $1.2 million in costs. The total cost to the taxpayers of Maryland approximately $3 million, more than $1.9 million more per case than a no-death-notice case. Current and forecasted prison costs are higher for death sentence cases ($1.3 million) than no-death-notice cases, and adjudication costs total $1.7 million.

我给你摆事实,讲道理,引经据典,你认为一个连两个星期前美国最高法院刚颁布的判决书都会引用的人会"既不能参与美国社会的实践,又不愿意通过文艺作品了解美国"么?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河