主题:为什么我们不能放弃国有企业:试论公平与发展 -- 冷酷的哲学
Major UK companies cut secret tax deals in Luxembourg
There was no obvious tax advantage on these transactions to be had in the UK.
Northern & Shell then set up a company in Luxembourg and transferred the loans there. Interest payments on those loans left the UK, leaving lower profits available for taxation by HMRC.
In Luxembourg, that money was effectively taxed at less than 1%, which meant Northern & Shell had sheltered profits which would otherwise have generated 6m in UK corporation tax.
Richard Brooks said of the practice: "The company puts its money into Luxembourg and borrows it back. It just sends money round in a circle and picks up a tax break on the way."
In a statement to the programme Northern & Shell said: "Our strategy is to comply with relevant regulations whilst minimising the tax burden for Northern & Shell and our customers. The board considers it entirely proper that Northern & Shell endeavours to structure its tax affairs in a tax efficient manner."
Tax expert Richard Murphy said of the practice: "All absolutely, without a shadow of a doubt, legal. I am still able to ask the question, is this acceptable? This is purely artificial structuring which is designed to undermine the tax revenues of the UK."
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂以多打少,以强欺弱是竞争不变的法宝,所以必须分裂对手 1 zxz221 字94 2012-07-03 21:51:25
🙂对!one size fits all!信仰操纵是中东人 cmmrc 字0 2012-07-02 09:56:23
🙂第三类国企是没有必要的 letmein 字1236 2012-06-23 02:12:33
🙂你是没有领教过跨国企业的避税手段
🙂不久前GE不是也公然不交税 电子赵括 字0 2012-06-25 12:18:46
🙂据说西门子在德国的公司年年账面亏损,N年没交税了 scorpioking 字0 2012-06-24 13:33:37
🙂上市公司,不可能的。 fuxd2002 字0 2012-06-27 01:22:14
🙂所得税不交而已,营业税要不要交?销售税要不要交? PBS 字39 2012-06-25 02:16:04