主题：草蜢讲解南海风云 -- CaoMeng
先说句题外的话：
这样的话最好还是不要出现在号称要敬业的帖子里边。
下面是正题：如果你想敬业一点的话，请去读下面的书：
Frivel, M. Taylor. "Offshore Island Disputes". Strong Borders, Secure Nation: Cooperation and Conflict in China's Territorial Disputes. Princeton University Press. pp. 267–299
你也可以读下面的文字。内容基本是引用上面提到的书的。
During the 1960s, however, the Republic of Vietnam Navy (ROVN) drove Chinese fishermen from the Paracel Island. The PRC could not effectively respond because the ROVN had significant air and naval support from the United States.
To focus on its war with the North, South Vietnam by 1966 had reduced its presence on the Spratlys to only a single weather observation garrison on Pattle Island. The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) made no attempt to remove this presence.
In 1973 after the Paris Peace Accords, the United States significantly reduced and eventually cut off military supplies to its ally, South Vietnam. The ARVN military presence on Pattle Island was reduced further to a single platoon of soldiers.
Despite the lack of effective control, South Vietnam signed offshore oil exploration contracts with Western companies in the Gulf of Tonkin, northwest of the Paracels.
或者，请拿出你自己的文献资料来，以证明上面的是胡说。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 4 层
🙂引用一句 迷途笨狼 字75 2014-05-27 10:57:02
🙂你想说什么呢？ 7 jent 字1211 2014-05-27 12:20:12
🙂在部分外事问题上，信维基真的不如信春哥 3 迷途笨狼 字518 2014-05-28 11:08:46
🙂好吧，如果你想敬业一点的话
🙂南海-西沙-南沙风云，既然要讲就讲明白 5 迷途笨狼 字1527 2014-05-29 10:59:34
🙂请问，是否对54年到74年年初南越事实上武装控制永乐群岛 1 jent 字251 2014-05-29 11:57:00
🙂白皮猪也不敢像你这么大嘴巴，起始时间都不对 迷途笨狼 字502 2014-05-30 11:28:05
🙂那么是否请你说清楚点呢？ jent 字64 2014-05-30 14:25:05