主题：【原创】一些凌乱的想法，想到哪说到哪 -- puma2011

I am going to write in my usual way, as explained many times before, food for thoughts, brief, trying to throw "points" out, with some physics analogies.

by the way, physics has quietly embedded into all kinds of ALGOs, running many "jobs" in uncle sam's white world.

1.

中美人员troops=labor force in general, or in the sense of troops vs elite;

there are a few posts here

中美人员素质对比 花5 集庆彪 字

2.

I have posted extensively about elite part, and recently about 生产关系 in my series of "汉密尔顿ABC"講金融, and 生产关系 is mostly created and managed by elite, as Marx said, marx is a great political economist, but that was then, it is now: humanity has progressed gigantically since then, as it should have.

3.

生产力, a big part of 生产力 is your troops, regardless, and how they perform (mainly 勞動生產率) relative to other countries is a big deal: your troops=your market consumption power as well, among other things.

you nation can only progress as a whole if your troops moves forward.

kind of why as 楼主 said, US elite is now seriously worried about their troops under TGchina's pressure, in terms of jobs, etc.

and at humanity level, "peaceful" competition among nations is always encouraged.

4.

in general, US troops has a much wider range of productivity, outstanding at higher end, and almost animal like in lower end, and as posted before:

"野性的呼唤: 美国力量之一 ", 中华民族的高智商: a complex issue", etc

basically, compared to US troops, Tgchina's troops are highly concentrated in the middle part of the "US range", lacking creativity etc at higher end, but extremely well educated, motivated, and hard working.

yes, Chinese have farmers, and now many 90 folks are full of 野性的呼唤 etc.

5.

I am here comparing US/Chinese troops much more in terms of information processing, in the background of their culture and other systematic variables, and often in an extreme way to get the points out, which may be offensive to many Chinese here in this forum. but, stay cool and keep open minded is more important than feeling humbled or humiliated. by the way, I have no intention to humiliate anybody here. what money do I make out of it(:)?

6.

Chinese troops is more of 静质量, with very little ability in information absorbing and processing, although improving;

US troops is much more of 相对论质量, a huge margin over Chinese troops, although the US pre college education (12 years before college) is now almost becoming a joke, which has already impacted US troops negatively.

7.

"静质量这一名词在狭义相对论中通常是指物质在静止时所测量的质量（静质量）。这个意义的质量与牛顿力学的质量相同。"

basically, Chinese troops lives (or perceives outside world) in a 牛顿力学 world, or 低速 world;

in a newton 機械 world, we don't really have to deal with 电磁 or information if you will;

then, we don't have to be information sensitive, or we don't need 相对论质量 concept/model, roughly and in an analogy.

8.

wiki: 相對論性質量的概念[编辑]

早期的发展：横向与纵向质量[编辑]

约瑟夫·汤姆孙在1881年[1] 承认一个带电的物体比一个没有带电的物体更难加速。因此静电能量表现成某种电磁质量，增加了物体的机械质量。之后威廉·维恩 （1900）[2]和 Max Abraham （1902）[3] 认为一个物体的总共质量与它的电磁质量相同。因为电磁质量取决于电磁能量，维恩所提出的质能关系是m=(4/3)E/c^2。

George Frederick Charles Searle 和汤姆孙也指出，电磁质量随着物体的速度而增加

without going further into details (SR is not an easy subject, particularly in china, due to language and other barriers, such as “朗道势垒” & GFW,etc)

but in general, as we all know, SR comes out of solving some paradoxes (伽利略变换 洛伦兹变换 etc: 光速不變 must 满足相对性原理) in the world of maxwell equation or 电磁 world, or information world fundamentally, as opposed to newton's 機械 world .

the world has completely changed since then, as we all know. information, information, information.

http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%8B%B9%E7%BE%A9%E7%9B%B8%E5%B0%8D%E8%AB%96%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E8%B3%AA%E9%87%8F

9

"\gamma=1/\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}"是洛伦兹因子，or you could call it 信息因子, and if your kids are further interested, there is an another important 因子 called phase 因子, 相位因子 of quantum physics, and I have posted quite bit about it, another concept challenging possibly to entire Chinese physics world in mainland.

10.

in today's global information economy, if your troops have no idea about what is and how to process information, then just forget about innovation, 成建制的 innovation.

11.

as posted before, we can't blame all these on TG, and to be "objectively" speaking, TG has modernized Chinese nation quite bit, compared to India if you will.

as posted before, more profoundly, the Chinese nation is almost "近亲繁殖" in its reproduction of all aspects of Chinese society.

as posted before, that atop many other reasons, us Chinese here in US is significantly outperformed by Indians in the camps of sp500 level executives, CEOS (indian CEOS: MSFT, Pepsi, master card etc), and 30% of sp500 companies were created by "non-us native"immigrants.

12.

another example here is this forum: recently there is some kind of post about HongKong ( I guess, I scanned twice, not knowing what the hell it talks about(:), no offense again), and there are 2000 flowers, many of them are from us Chinese here in US, I would think.

the Chinese ALGOs running in their blood draw them over to posts like that, arguing, cheering, like they have nothing else to do? OMG(:). again, just as an example, on offense to whomever.

in this case, your Chinese blood is kind of 电解质, going into your brain, activating those Chinese ALGOs automatically, OMG(:). Uncle TG smiles, I told you, baby. "没有了祖国你将什么都不是".

as posted before, the Chinese culture and pride are just deeply in our blood, period.

13.

now, what is the point?

the point is: the hard working and very "nice" Chinese troops of 1.3 Billion is a huge advantage of TGchina's 載體 economy, with a tons of profits to be made, even going forward, for many years to come.

Chinese troops may be lacking 相对论质量 now, but absent of a third world war, the gaps of all kinds between US and TGchina should be expected to become narrower, not widen, however slow it may be.

14

obviously, US and TGchina elite capital know all these "models" much better than I can articulate: then, how to make money out of these Chinese troops? (:)

15.

another point I have posted a couple of times before: 剥削有功 may be extreme, but it is true.

economics, 勞動生產率 of capitalism is all about sucking money/capital out of stupid/weak hands, putting money/capital in the hands of smart/strong innovators, so society can progress as whole.

yes, there are humanitarian aspects of capitalism and they should be improved as well, etc, but that does not change the nature of the game. not at all. period.

nevertheless, those 道德經 tricks have been played by politicians all over the world forever, and particularly by Chinese social elite in managing Chinese troops for 5 k years.

one of reasons: in china, social elite has been political elite, 5 k years.

politicians=披著道德經羊皮的 smart 狼, for most of politicians.

deal with it, baby(:).

how to normalize political system is still a challenge to humanity. right now, politicians are wasting tons of system's money.

16

"汉密尔顿ABC"講金融 (2): 温水煮青蛙 晓兵

in the "温水煮青蛙" model under "华盛顿共识", anybody of Chinese troops can become a super rich innovator, "fair" and productive?

but, "毛林共识下, TG金融逻辑鏈: 无风险利率>10%": ugly or beautiful?

kind of why posts such as "puma2011：【原创】一些凌乱的想法，想到哪说到哪" ""汉密尔顿ABC"講金融 are so interesting, now all making sense?

• 中美人员对比: "静质量", "相对论质量"