主题:伊拉克内战还是古罗马斗兽场--推行民主还是推行殖民? -- 思想的行者
http://www.ccthere.com/alist/4027458
a couple of comments to my guess of "586 Algo" as in that above post:
1.
thanks to "喝点红茶上会网", now I have some clue about white's 因信称义 as a core part of its ideology algo.
"汉密尔顿ABC"講金融
thanks to "汉密尔顿ABC", he articulates white's 金融 algo very well.
2.
social science is rough and tough, as I said, humanity has yet to normalize its political system, capitalist financial system has been "somehow half normalized", political and ideology system still have long long way to go, in terms of "normalization" if it ever comes, particularly in china.
月黑风高杀人夜, then you start to see 黎明 or "normalization", then all information "priced in", kind of like 绝热近似 (Born-Oppenheimer approximation),and in 黎明, 路上捡到钱 still possible, but big money/profits are made already by those smart traders/players of 月黑风高杀人夜.
3.
information physics: 熱力學, GR etc.
white elites are basically running their ALGO of information economy/"生产关系经济" to suck money from everywhere, domestic or international, TGchina 生产力经济(mostly low to mid-end manufacturing, if not forever) in particular, as their "target of economic war of information ".
the soft/weak part of 586 Algo: "因信稱義因信得生”, 信中共中央: 内战内行, 外战外行, for the foreseeable future.
"内战内行, 外战外行" outcome is not bad, as long as your ass still hangs on there, even your pants already got fxxked off, not bad at all: Soviet's had already fallen apart into pieces, on its way of being normalizing into white's game 民主自由金融.
"生的伟大 死的光荣"=减法 operation of humanity 进化论 ALGO, with modern capitalism as a dissipative dynamical system: someone has to be periodically 减掉 from the system, for the system to move on, forging ahead into the next phase of humanity's civilization struggle.
耗散系統 is not really a good translation: Dissipative dynamical systems=浴血重生, and forever.
- 相关回复 上下关系5
压缩 3 层
🙂本質上ALGO: 落后=to be fxxked,句號 晓兵 字9931 2014-07-03 12:12:03
🙂刘亚洲(?):"改變國際舊秩序的,不是蘇聯。而是美國" 2 晓兵 字25782 2014-07-03 18:48:08
🙂违规禁,【补充】可申诉或道歉来解。偏要看
🙂586 Algo: "因信稱義, 因信得生”, 信黨中央
🙂Tgchina: 成也集權败也集權? 晓兵 字3212 2014-07-04 11:39:21