主题:冷眼看占中 -- 种植园土
你引的论文恰恰论证了第十三修正案不是所谓的例外:“......Section One of the Thirteenth Amendment is not the aberration that most have claimed; it is consistent with the state action doctrine and only applies to governmental actors. However, Section Two allows Congress to act on private individuals when a state has refused to enforce its generally applicable laws protecting bodily integrity and freedom from restraint. Both aspects of this analysis demonstrate how the case law that has arisen from the Thirteenth Amendment is in harmony with the revised view set forth in this Article, and that the constitutional ban of slavery is properly understood as an anti-caste provision prohibiting discriminatory governmental exemptions from laws protecting persons from physical force.”
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂这个案件不算判例。 1 种植园土 字136 2014-10-09 18:53:59
🙂凭着我看美剧的理解 2 lix 字30 2014-10-09 19:18:21
🙂美剧不靠谱,少看为好 4 种植园土 字3132 2014-10-09 20:24:30
🙂论文再靠谱,你看不懂也是白搭
🙂既然看得懂就看细点 2 种植园土 字657 2014-10-11 09:17:59
🙂第十三修正案的确可能是例外 2 ErgoSum 字62 2014-10-09 21:33:55
🙂哟,开个玩笑,这么大动静 3 lix 字1197 2014-10-09 20:37:48
🙂黎是人精,后面还有中情局的参谋 9 lix 字310 2014-10-08 11:56:34