主题:【原创】不完美的新冠疫苗也是有作用的,必须的。 -- 吃土的蚯蚓
总不能搬运一些没有说服力的所谓证据来证明什么吧?
也用不着破腹自证,你要是有能力,可以尝试一下说明:
The major study limitations included that the study was an observational study based on real-world data rather than a randomized control trial, and the quality of data could be affected by the accuracy and completeness of medical records.
能不能解释清楚,既然这样是上面这样没有对照组,数据质量也有局限,为何这么肯定有关联呢?
QPT was associated with a substantially lower risk of in-hospital mortality, without extra risk of acute liver injury or acute kidney injury among patients hospitalized with COVID-19.
连RCT都没有,我就奇怪了,这文章的作者,是如何肯定QPT,而不是其他因素有关联的呢?
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 16 层
🙂这位本质是中医黑,不是中医粉 4 普鲁托 字502 2021-09-23 02:30:57
🙂啊哈,原理如此 懒厨 字141 2021-09-23 03:02:45
🙂给了那么多证据你却不接受 1 zero9999 字72 2021-09-23 00:14:48
🙂证据也要讲质量吧?
🙂你不知道在这样试验中会有人死么? 1 zero9999 字336 2021-09-23 06:03:24
🙂莫非你的意思是相信就可以了? 1 懒厨 字214 2021-09-23 06:17:31
🙂你真认为有人这样想?只觉得是胡搅蛮缠 zero9999 字0 2021-09-23 06:41:02
🙂应该确实有人这么想 懒厨 字105 2021-09-23 07:11:34