主题：从原神到雷导的《拿破仑》：自己的文化，一定要自己拍出来 -- 亮子

就事论事吧

【这部电影因其的历史不准确性饱受争议，诸多历史学家指出其情节上与历史不符之处。

英国历史学家，《拿破仑大帝》作者安德鲁·罗伯茨指出：“这部电影重现在史学界早被驳斥的拿破仑形象，且雷德利·斯科特还进一步增加他自身的偏见。在斯科特眼中，拿破仑除了战场上的战术意识外没有任何成就，并暗示其与希特勒相像……1792年至1815年间，法国与反法同盟爆发七次反法同盟战争，拿破仑仅发动其中两起。这部电影没有提及拿破仑的诸多改革与正面作为……假如斯科特阅读过数百本拿破仑传记中的一本，那么电影中的几百个基本错误本可以避免。[20]”

格鲁吉亚裔美国历史学家，《拿破仑战争：全球史》与《剑桥拿破仑战争史》作者亚历山大·米卡贝里泽称：“这部电影远比‘不好’更糟……具有一系列错误。[21]”

法国历史学家，《帝国之路：通向最高权力的拿破仑》作者帕特里斯·格里费称：“这部电影有大量历史错误，充满极左觉醒文化。[22]”】

以上引用部分来自中文维基的《拿破仑》电影词条中文版。估计是台湾人编辑的。你有哪里不明白的地方，我可以帮你理解。

下面来自同词条的英文版本中关于这部电影的历史不真实部分的评论。

【Many critics of the film's historical aspects, including historians Adam Tooze and Andrew Roberts安德鲁·罗伯茨, believed it ignored Napoleon's numerous non-military achievements, as well as his popularity with the French people.[73][74] Roberts, a Napoleon biographer, said his portrayal as a proto-Hitler was "as tired as it is absurd".[75][76] Historian Zack White（英国历史研究者） agreed, saying the film mirrored contemporary British propaganda denigrating Napoleon as a "Corsican ruffian".[76] Ellin Stein（英国专栏作家）, writing for Slate, pointed out that Napoleon was known for his passion for literature and Enlightenment thought – a far cry from the boorish, loutish soldier that Scott depicts.[77] French historian Patrice Gueniffey帕特里斯·格里费 called the movie "anti-French" and full of historical inaccuracies.[78] Joan Tumblety（英国南安大学法国现代史教授） wrote that the film ignored relevant historical atrocities such as the Siege of Jaffa.[79]

Napoleon did not attend the execution of Marie Antoinette, as Napoleon was commanding forces at Toulon at the time. The movie depicts a defeated Napoleon meeting Wellington, whereas in actuality, the two men never met.[80][81][82] Oxford historian Michael Broers（牛津历史学家，本片历史顾问，顾问而已）, who worked on the movie, noted several inaccuracies in Napoleon and Josephine's relationship, including the timing of their divorce (1809, not 1807), its nature (Napoleon did not slap Josephine during their divorce), and its rationale (Josephine is portrayed as encouraging the divorce, whereas in reality, she was fearful of it).[83] The historical Josephine also died the day before Napoleon's exile to Elba, not a year later during the Hundred Days, and thus was not a factor in Napoleon's return.[80]

The film presents Napoleon as firing on the Pyramids of Giza, which never happened.[77] Cairo egyptologist Salima Ikram（埃及历史学家，指出拿破仑对狮身人面像和金字塔的尊重而不可能如电影中所描述的朝金字塔开火） pointed out that Napoleon held the Sphinx and the pyramids in high esteem and used them as motivation for his troops. "He definitely did not take pot shots at them."[84] In an interview with The Times, Scott defended his depiction of the attack on the pyramids as being "a fast way of saying [Napoleon] took Egypt."（与时代杂志访谈中，斯科特说他描述拿破仑对吉萨大金字塔开火是表明拿破仑夺取了埃及的一个快捷电影手法。草！）[85]

Historian Paul du Quenoy（美国出版业大亨，历史学者，艺术评论者） criticized the depiction of Napoleonic era battlefield tactics, especially the Austerlitz sequence, "one of the few battles that the film depicts in detail." He noted that historians consider the ambush on the ice to be myth of the Austerlitz campaign, "a minor detail whose significance has been doubted almost since the time of the battle."[80] Napoleon, an artillery officer by training, never personally led a cavalry charge, as is shown at Borodino and Waterloo.[81][86][87] Franz-Stefan Gady（当代美国国际政治研究者，偏向军事战略研究）, writing for Foreign Policy, described the battle sequences as "a Hollywood mishmash of medieval melees, meaningless cannonades, and World War I-style infantry advances." "For all of Scott’s fixation on Napoleon’s battles, he seems curiously disinterested in how the real Napoleon fought them."[81]

Scott dismissed criticisms of the film's historical inaccuracies. "Napoleon dies then, ten years later, someone writes a book. Then someone takes that book and writes another, and so, 400 [sic] years later, there's a lot of imagination [in history books]. When I have issues with historians, I ask: 'Excuse me, mate, were you there? No? Well, shut the fuck up then.'"[88][89] Scott also declared, responding to French critics, that "the French don't even like themselves".[90]】

我只把导演对历史学家的反驳翻译在这里，其说法与网上很多无视历史的帖子腔调很类似。

【拿破仑死了。接着10年后有人写了一本书。然后有人看了那书后又写了一本，就这样一本又一本写下去，400年后，产生了许多想象中的历史。每当我和历史学家的观点有冲突时，我就问，抱歉，你当时在那儿吗？没有？那你就闭上你那窟窿。斯科特同样声称，他对于来自法国方面的评论是，“法国人连自己都不喜欢。（何况我）”。】

这部电影是斯科特本人的商业作品，在商言商而已。

很遗憾他竟然说英文。在你和楼下眼里连累了英语作为一种语言的存在。

我上面所引用的文字都是英语。

不过还是要感谢你，如楼下说得，不用看这部电影了，省钱。