主题：【文摘】A Strategy for a Successful Scientific Career -- 不爱吱声

A Strategy for a Successful Scientific Career

---------------------------------------------

Nature 431, 1041 (28 October 2004)

A strategy for a successful scientific career

Turning points --- A wake-up call

Bruce Alberts

Bruce Alberts is the president of the National Academy of Sciences, 500 5th Street, NW, Washington DC 20001, USA.

Abstract: How failing a PhD led to a strategy for a successful scientific career. 'Failure' was a blessing in disguise.

One of my most important formative experiences as a scientist was very traumatic at the time. In the spring of 1965, I had finished writing my PhD thesis at Harvard University, in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and had purchased aeroplane tickets to take my wife Betty and our one-year-old daughter with me for a postdoctoral year in Geneva, Switzerland. Only one step remained — a meeting of my thesis committee to approve the granting of my PhD degree in biophysics. No one in recent memory had failed at this late stage. But to my great surprise, the committee failed me, specifying the need for more experiments that eventually required six more months of research.

This was, of course, a great embarrassment and a shock to my ego. There were the practical problems of having to remain at Harvard — our apartment had already been rented to the next tenant and my small family had nowhere to live. But most importantly, I was to spend the next few months struggling to answer two questions that would be critical for my future. What had gone wrong, and did I really have what it takes to be a scientist?

As an undergraduate working with Jacques Fresco in Paul Doty's laboratory at Harvard, I was handed a research project that proved to be very successful. My undergraduate thesis was quickly converted into two important papers in 1960. This largely undeserved success gave me a false image of how easy it would be to do science. It also enabled me to persuade Paul Doty to allow me to test my own theoretical model for the initiation of chromosome replication as the centrepiece of my PhD research.

According to my model, the sites at which DNA replication begins (now called replication origins) should be located at the two ends of each DNA helix in a chromosome. If this model was correct, the enzyme DNA polymerase should create a transient covalent linkage between the two complementary DNA strands at the tip of a chromosome (a 'DNA crosslink'). I began an extensive search in DNA genomes for crosslinks that were located near the sites where replication begins. None of the tests supported my particular model, but I did find other crosslinks in all of the chromosomes that I tested. I spent several years characterizing these mysterious and unexpected 'naturally occurring crosslinks', but even 40 years later, their structure and origin are still not understood (J. Mol. Biol. 32, 405−421; 1968).

In retrospect, the shock of having my PhD thesis rejected in 1965 proved to be a critical step in shaping me as a scientist, because it forced me to recognize the central importance of the strategy that underlies any major scientific quest.

I had witnessed the frustration of scientists who were pursuing obvious experiments that were simultaneously being carried out in other laboratories. These scientists were constantly in a race. It had always seemed to me that, even if they were able to publish their results six months before a competing laboratory, they were unlikely to make truly unique contributions.