主题：【原创】关于汉奸汪精卫的争论可以休矣－兼谈主和和叛卖的界限 -- 天策上将
everyone in history talked about Social Contract. From Plato to Cicero, to Machiavelli, to Jean Jacque Rouseau...so on and so forth. Now you need to be specific and tell me exactly whose argument you are interested to debate on? I wrote about more than a hundred essays on Social Contract during the first 2 years of college.
As far as I know, it is a notion that has been proven meritless, destructive, and backwards. I have debated it to death before I truned 20. It has become a dead topic for me. In otherwords, I am not interested in lecturing if you have read nothing besides the 3rd-party literature you mentioned on Social Contract? If so, please proceed to ask a more specific question, so we may debate it.
With that said, do you wish to talk about Plato's arguments on Social Contract first? Or you prefer to start with Hobbes/Locke?
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂去读一读《社会契约论》 4 金口玉言 字142 2006-05-21 08:34:03
🙂I am sorry but it is really difficult for me to type in Chinese, but..
🙂人才,建议赶快派往白宫担任总统~ simplyred 字0 2006-05-31 08:56:07
🙂社会演进的推动力决不是你的人文情怀。 赫然 字99 2006-05-26 11:48:48
😁【原创】You're absolutely right about the fact that the SenatorZhao 字537 2006-05-30 21:03:27
🙂没事顶一下，希望马英九不是汪精卫 浅水鱼 字74 2006-05-09 16:47:08