主题：【原创】750度低烧 -- 晨枫
家园 三星的9系液晶是真的让人惊讶 上次闲逛偶然看到一台三星的液晶电视，其时显示的是静止烟花画面，那效果真的是没有话说。黑暗处深不见底；明亮处颜色丰富，层次分明，画面异常细腻。再一看，是最新的9系列，46寸1千5百镑。不过那感觉确实是非常之好。
昨天看到一个另人惊奇的电视机，丹麦的 Bang & Olufsen Beovision 9的等离子电视，全高清，落地式，内置中置音箱。画面效果不好说，那设计的确是与众不同。只是非凡的设计就有非凡的价钱，15，000英镑。与电视配套的一对落地式音箱，也是15，000的价格。不过放在一起还真是绝配。边上的老黑看得眼睛珠子都掉了出来，连呼this is bad! this is bad!
有兴趣的朋友可以看看http://www.bang-olufsen.com/video
家园 B&O是designer item 卖点在于款式，而不是A/V性能。我有一套B&O的音响，放在客厅里绝对可以当现代派雕塑对待，音响方面就不如Denon加Axiom音箱了。
家园 正好最近准备买电视 也看中了SAMSUNG，原先准备买650的，老大有没有研究过750和650的区别？貌似08年的650型号也是50000：1的动态对比？另外amazon上有些人抱怨750的边框漏光，在暗的屋子里有"halo effect"，不知晨大用下来的经验如何？
家园 650应该是35000：1 不过也有可能我看错了，只是不能听店里的人的说法，这些家伙太信口开河了，告诉我750和850只是多几个插头，反差是一样的，云云。根本是不同的panel，怎么会一样呢？
我没有发现边框漏光的问题，房间也不很暗，没有发现halo的问题。不过这是BD有halo还是DVD有halo？DVD分辨率下，如果设定不好的话，是会有halo，这是低分辨率“伪装”高分辨率的结果，就像Photoshop里的over sharpening一样，不是电视机的过错。
650系列也很棒。LP开始就是看到650，才下决心不要Sony的。不过个人建议：要是650和750价格相差不太多，买750吧。东西还是越新越好，要的不是绝对最低价，而是sweet spot。个人认为，750是现在的sweet spot。850和950太贵了，650以下稍有点落伍了。just my 2 cents。
家园 amazon上面650的spec是这样写的 多谢，我还没去店里，节前不想排队去等停车位，等节后再去。主要是在amazon上研究。
New -- 50,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio: up from 25,000:1 on 2007 models (Learn more)New -- Blazing 4ms response time: down from 8ms on 2007 models thanks to a new high-speed liquid crystal
New -- Transparent and Opaque Color (TOC) bezel with infused color creates an ultra-sleek shape and appearance (Learn more)
New -- InfoLink: Get free RSS feeds of news, weather and sports right to your HDTV with a built-in Ethernet port (Learn more)
New -- 4 HDMI 1.3 ports: Simplay compliant, and up from 3 on 2007 models (Learn more)
New -- Sports and Game modes boost on-screen performance and interaction with the latest gaming systems
750多出的东西：
Series 7: Internal flash memory (1GB) with pre-loaded interactive content such as cooking recipes, children's entertainment, HD artwork and more, Integrated woofer for an enhanced audio experience, DLNA-Compatibility for better interopability with electronics, computers and mobile devices from many different manufacturers650市价$1470,750是$1580，看来性价比确实是750好，主要是多了DLNA和woofer。
关于"Halo Effect"看样子不是漏光，而是图像在周边挡板上的反射。
Beautiful-looking set, amazing picture, but the "halo effect" (fuzzy reflection of the edge of the picture in the 45-degree clear edge of the bezel) is extremely distracting and simply inexcusable in a higher-end TV like this... in any TV at all, really. What was Samsung thinking? Did they not notice this during testing, or (and I struggle to believe this) did they actually intentionally build in this "feature" as some people claim to have been told by customer service? At best, people tolerate it, but many, including my significant other and I, aren't willing to deal with it. Had an ambivalent viewing experience for 3 days, then decided to return the set. Hoping the 850 won't have this ridiculous characteristic, but the images I've seen so far look as though it has the same 45-degree clear bezel edge... awaiting the reviews.EDIT 9/26/08: Per the 8th comment below, Samsung now appears to be acknowledging and servicing this issue.
EDIT 10/4/08: Various forum comments from people who have received the Samsung "fix" (bezel replaced with a modified bezel) for the halo effect are indicating that it did not solve the problem for their sets.
家园 花So you think you can dance 家园 我现在已经没有感觉了。我自己买房子后第一部电视是索尼的 42寸等离子，看了4年，烧屏了，后来换了东芝的46寸液晶。刚用等离子时候还有那么一点新鲜感，后来很快没兴趣了，因为国内高清的片源太少。我最憎恨广东的有线电视，去年说是新上马个数字电视，画面没觉得清晰，把我原来可以看的HBO\CINEMAX\STAR MOVIE全干掉了，BT/EMULE下载FULL HD的片子吧，3M的ADSL慢的像爬，我的PS3也就扔在那里，BD的片子也不知道哪里有卖。总之OLED或SED出来之前，还有FULL HD的片源没有丰富以前，不花冤枉钱了。