主题：最高领导人下令通讯工具和社交网站须受监听。土鳖太可恶了。 -- 红霄帐底
家园 最高领导人下令通讯工具和社交网站须受监听。土鳖太可恶了。 土鳖太可恶了。居然代表了时代新潮流。连美憋都不惜狂打沟狗的脸，快步跟上，后来居上了。
美国媒体报道称，美国总统奥巴马为了“国家安全和反恐”等原因，将批准经费用于邮件接收终端、网络通讯工具以及美国各大社交网站的监听系统研发，并要求这些网络平台的运营商将自己的平台向监听系统敞开。
据环球网引述美国《纽约时报》报道，白宫发言人于27日表示，此次的网络监听系统，覆盖的对象包括了黑莓（Blackberry）等电子邮件接收终端、Skype等网络通讯工具，以及Facebook在内的各大美国社交网站。白宫方面将要求这些设备和网站的运营商在2011年以前让自己的平台对监听系统开放，以保证美国警方对各种网络突发事件的应对能力。
报道称，美国国防部官员表示，这一项目具有迫切的必要性，因为恐怖分子和罪犯们正在逐渐放弃电话这种联络方式，转而投向网络。美国联邦调查局发言人则强调，项目中所说的监听必须是在“合法且被授权”的情况下。这一项目已经遭到了业界一些人的反对，有网络安全专家指出，白宫的这一要求将使得这些网络平台更容易遭到黑客的攻击。
本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)家园 这事不新鲜吧 美帝都干了好多年了。
监控系统收集、存储、分析海量数据需要消耗海量能源，设计优化算法节能的科研经费都发下来几年了
家园 用墙把民主保护起来！！！ 家园 美国真落后，英国早就立法监听一切网络，电话和fax了 家园 美国好像是如果监听某人的电话，需要检察官同意 当然这是很多年前的老规矩了，不知道现在改了没有？觉得老美有些作茧自缚的味道，不做亏心事不怕半夜鬼叫门，你是正人君子还怕别人听你电话？就算你的电话包含一些不怎么招人待见的东西，FBI也不至于什么事都给你捅出去吧？
家园 再次强调，这是完全不同的 人家米国是为了保护人民安全、保护免煮灯塔免遭邪恶势力攻击，被迫如此。
TG是为了防民之口维护独裁政府搞特务统治。
这能一样么？
家园 屁股还是决定脑袋！ 说的是有一腚的道理，主观决定客观！社会主义的草还是资本主义的苗确实不好分！
家园 五美分们是不是要涨工资了？ 家园 纽约时报的链接在此 Yahoo: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100927/ap_on_hi_te/us_internet_wiretaps
NYtimes: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/27/us/27wiretap.html?_r=1#
WASHINGTON – Broad new regulations being drafted by the Obama administration would make it easier for law enforcement and national security officials to eavesdrop on Internet and e-mail communications like social networking Web sites and BlackBerries, The New York Times reported Monday.The newspaper said the White House plans to submit a bill next year that would require all online services that enable communications to be technically equipped to comply with a wiretap order. That would include providers of encrypted e-mail, such as BlackBerry, networking sites like Facebook and direct communication services like Skype.
Federal law enforcement and national security officials say new the regulations are needed because terrorists and criminals are increasingly giving up their phones to communicate online.
"We're talking about lawfully authorized intercepts," said FBI lawyer Valerie E. Caproni. "We're not talking about expanding authority. We're talking about preserving our ability to execute our existing authority in order to protect the public safety and national security."
The White House plans to submit the proposed legislation to Congress next year.
The new regulations would raise new questions about protecting people's privacy while balancing national security concerns.
James Dempsey, the vice president of the Center for Democracy and Technology , an Internet policy group, said the new regulations would have "huge implications."
"They basically want to turn back the clock and make Internet services function the way that the telephone system used to function," he told the Times.
The Times said the Obama proposal would likely include several requires:
_Any service that provides encrypted messages must be capable of unscrambling them.
_Any foreign communications providers that do business in the U.S. would have to have an office in the United States that's capable of providing intercepts.
_Software developers of peer-to-peer communications services would be required to redesign their products to allow interception.
The Times said that some privacy and technology advocates say the regulations would create weaknesses in the technology that hackers could more easily exploit.
