主题：某正建造航母的大国，你民主了吗？ -- 老科学的家
我只是在这个地方试试水。结果觉得很麻烦，得跟鬼子用英文论战——我哪有这些闲工夫。
不过眼下至少得对付这个回复：
Quote:
no available Carrier-based planes
Well, Britain has Harriers and Sea Harriers.
Quote:
this leading power lacks the technique to manufacture one of the most important facility, the gantry cran
This applies neither to China nor Britain. Maybe you're confused.
Quote:
every citizen of this country has to pay 4757 Dollars for Americans' unscrupulous consumption.
This sounds suspiciously like China. This is a board to discuss issues in China, so if it's not the country you're referring to, it has no place on this board.
Quote:
increasingly unrest society
Quote:
one of the world leading powers are speedily building
Quote:
one of the most important facility
Quote:
permanent member state of UN Security Council
Quote:
its stabilisation authorities are oppressed with great pressure
This is just pathetically poor English, but it may be good Chinglish. I hope for the sake of everyone you are not trying to be an English teacher.
Before you start trying to be the wise guy, I'd suggest you check facts, the suitability of posts, basic concepts of sea power, and fundamentals of English grammar and semantics. Do you even know the difference between a rally and a riot?
关于舰载机，龙门吊和国债倒是找到英文链接了，只是后面的内容得花一番心思，我这人有点懒，大家帮忙想想怎么回复？
A Carrier of Civil unrest
Recently, one of the world leading powers is building an iconic aircraft carrier in one of its northern port. This project is to be yet another symbol of said country's self-perceived world dominance, even though the carrier faces the weird predicament of having no plane to carry upon completion.
This latest symbol will be in keeping with a long line of such symbols this country has accumulated from its imperial past, among which are its unique tea culture, its literature achievement, its influential language and characters.
Indeed, this ancient culture has a lot to be proud of: it had won both world wars and had earned a permenant seat at the united nation's security council. Furthermore, it was already the epitome of human civilization before the current superpower, the USA, was conceived as a nation.
Yet, today, the people of this once proud civilization have to bear the debt of american consumer; as a prominent economist pointed out, as a nation who purchase a large amount of US debt, "every citizen of this country has to pay 4757 Dollars for Americans' unscrupulous consumption." （最好把原话放在这里）
Although this country has been trying to style itself as a world power, many observers question its legitimacy, pointing out the fact that this nation is hardly unified; a good example of which would be different parts of said nation competing under different flags in certain sport event.
Furthermore, the real story of this nation is much less glossy than the image it is desperately trying to hold up.
Just as the aircraft carrier is being constructed, severe riots break out in major cities of the nation, threatening to destabilize the already fragile economic situation and forcing the authority to crack down on the rioters with brute force. Extreme measures including the censorship of certain social networking website were employed, denying basic human rights to its civilian.
As the Vancouver sun so succinctly summarizes, the society of this country is in "pathosis".
Such social unrest is not without cause. As a french commentator told the BBC, this country has one of the most "unequal society". As such, this leads to the nation facing constant civil unrest, and as the American publication Foreign Policy pointed out, it is merely history repeating itself.
Some state leaders had urged the nation's leadership to address its social issue, as well as restore basic respects to its citizenry. One of them even quipped, "Who would treat their own people like that?"
Is a new, shiny military icon worth the social cost to the country? For the sake of humanity, we hope the leadership of this nation do not wait to find out the hard way.
汗死我了 我花了10min才看懂这句话的深刻内涵。。。
人家说情商就是你理解别人心思和想法的能力
我觉得我情商太低了。。。
被钓鱼的感觉不好受啊
不知道原来这个就是钓鱼。
最后被恼羞成怒的删了。有诗文为证：
自由逗士义旗扬
英伦王师感彷徨
老瓦拖轮黑烟起
伊丽莎白泪两行
百度涸泽成泥淖
二吧钓客下远洋
我自横竿向天笑
凯迪深处有鱼塘
又云：
钓鱼是一项可耻的休闲活动，手段残忍，破坏生态平衡，不讲愚权，是可忍，孰不可忍。严厉警告望风而来的垂钓者，鱼儿们宁死不屈，不是鱼死，就是钩亡，宁可站着嘴巴挂烂，绝不跪下承认脑残。钓者安知鸿鱼之志哉，子非鱼，安知鱼之乐也，脑残二逼宁有种乎？今认也烧饼，不认也烧饼，既为烧饼，为民主自由而烧饼可矣。太史公曰：“鱼固有一死，或重于泰山，或轻于五毛。"今为咬钩而死者即重于泰山，为党国垂钓者即轻于五毛，当民主实现之日，必杀五毛全家以谢众鱼之魂也。
在这沸腾的鱼塘里，鱼儿们要振翅高呼：“今夜我们都是民主鱼，缴获了无数专制的钓钩。"啊，美利坚，鱼类的希望，你指引鱼们用菊花夹痛了钓者的JJ，让他们不敢再继续猖狂。
第一次看也差点上当，还好是树展看了一下回复
这钩下的太逼真了
不能实现。
人类不能进化也是缘于此。
把社会政治想象成一个生态圈，维系平衡是很重要的。左派右派之间有一个竞争制衡又互相依存的关系。哪怕是脑残的鱼儿，那也是一个重要环节，捕捞过分也不是好事。小钓怡情，炸鱼可耻！