主题:【原创】从纽约,梁启超,巴菲特,熊彼得想到的,兼回cyonghu -- 无所不在
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2006ar/2006ar.pdf
楼主引用的一段在第16页:
would describe the situation if our imports were $.76 trillion – a full 6% of GDP – and we had no exports.)
Making these purchases that weren’t reciprocated by sales, the U.S. necessarily transferred ownership of its assets or IOUs to the rest of the world. Like a very wealthy but self-indulgent family, we peeled off a bit of what we owned in order to consume more than we produced.
The U.S. can do a lot of this because we are an extraordinarily rich country that has behaved responsibly in the past. The world is therefore willing to accept our bonds, real estate, stocks and businesses. And we have a vast store of these to hand over.
These transfers will have consequences, however. Already the prediction I made last year about one fall-out from our spending binge has come true: The “investment income” account of our country – positive in every previous year since 1915 – turned negative in 2006. Foreigners now earn more on their
U.S. investments than we do on our investments abroad. In effect, we’ve used up our bank account and turned to our credit card. And, like everyone who gets in hock, the U.S. will now experience “reverse
compounding” as we pay ever-increasing amounts of interest on interest.
I want to emphasize that even though our course is unwise, Americans will live better ten or twenty years from now than they do today. Per-capita wealth will increase. But our citizens will also be forced every year to ship a significant portion of their current production abroad merely to service the cost of our huge debtor position. It won’t be pleasant to work part of each day to pay for the over-consumption of your ancestors. I believe that at some point in the future U.S. workers and voters will find this annual “tribute” so onerous that there will be a severe political backlash. How that will play out in markets is impossible to predict – but to expect a “soft landing” seems like wishful thinking.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂花呀 周来九 字83 2007-12-16 23:16:27
🙂也许是不知道前因后果,说实话,看不懂。 2 杀猪杀屁股 字205 2007-12-15 03:36:29
🙂花上,好文。 烟波钓徒 字0 2007-12-14 01:25:40
🙂花,兼补Buffet的信的连接
🙂谢谢你,巴菲特先生的担忧正说明我写这些玩艺的必要性 cyonghu 字326 2007-12-14 00:10:45
🙂您不肯接受别人的意见,是您自己的损失。 syx317 字0 2007-12-14 00:46:27
🙂在我看来,接受错误的意见更是我的损失 cyonghu 字0 2007-12-14 01:41:13
🙂花之 kmy1810 字0 2007-12-13 23:53:43