主题:【原创】宇宙学的终结 -- 苏萸
这个说法恐怕有些过了,原文明明提到了很多科学发现,大段大段地叙述了近年宇宙学的发展,虽然没有详细介绍各种发现的具体过程与内容(主题不在于此),但文章的推断很明显是基于这些发现,而非形而上的哲学思维。只要认真地看看其内容,再对比一下宇宙学的最新发现,就不难看出这点。
那篇文章基本上是根据已知最新证据作出一种猜想(文章并不否认这点,看标题就知道)。须知我们对宇宙模型的建立还处于非常初步的阶段,比如说‘宇宙扩张在加速’这一点,距离发现充分证据并被广泛接受至今还不到十年,所谓暗物质也还停留在理论猜测的阶段。以后我们会不会得出新的、与现有结论相冲突的发现?有这种可能。但这并不妨碍我们基于现有的认知作出合理推测,不然科学如何进步?
随手截取几段:
Where else might astronomers of the future search for evidence of the big bang? Would the cosmic microwave background allow them to probe the dynamics of the universe? Alas, no. As the universe expands, the wavelengths of the background radiation stretch and the radiation becomes more diffuse. When the universe is 100 billion years old, the peak wavelengths of the microwave radiation will be on the scale of meters, corresponding to radio waves instead of microwaves. The intensity of the radiation will be diluted by a factor of one trillion and might never be seen.
Even further into the future, the cosmic background will become truly unobservable. The space between stars in our galaxy is filled with an ionized gas of electrons. Low-frequency radio waves cannot penetrate such a gas; they are absorbed or reflected. A similar effect is the reason that AM radio stations can be picked up far from their cities of origin at night; the radio waves reflect off the ionosphere and back down to the ground. The interstellar medium can be thought of as one big ionosphere filling the galaxy. Any radio waves with frequencies below about one kilohertz (a wavelength of greater than 300 kilometers) cannot penetrate into our galaxy. Radio astronomy below one kilohertz is forever impossible inside our galaxy. When the universe is about 25 times its present age, the microwave background will be stretched beyond this wavelength and become undetectable to the residents of the galaxy. Even before then, the subtle patterns in this background radiation, which have provided so much useful information to today’s cosmologists, will become too muted to study.
你在提出疑义之前,有没有认真理解原文的内容呢?如有语言障碍,具体不清楚的地方我可以尝试帮你翻译。当然,在专业知识方面我也是个半桶水,就不要期望太高了。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂请把我跟萨佛的讨论看下去 1 卷心菜 字710 2008-03-02 07:15:22
🙂谢谢!花.虽然由于英文水平限制,还要多花时间读 萨佛131 字144 2008-02-27 14:24:20
🙂大致学了科学美国人2008-3那文章.感觉属哲学讨论 萨佛131 字1304 2008-02-28 01:31:15
🙂非科学角度的哲学讨论?
🙂请看您引用的英文部分 萨佛131 字609 2008-02-28 18:57:24
🙂原文可不止我的引用部份 卷心菜 字1482 2008-02-29 07:04:50