主题:【原创】中国高速铁道“1000亿元”的投标争论 -- xixi
qn 1.
120(France)+35(Canada)+105(Japan)=260>250?
Is this difference rounding error? So, it might be a huge rounding error.
qn 2.
"日方得到合同款:800亿日元=60亿RMB
四方得到合同款:600亿日元=45亿RMB
日本和四方的分工如下:
日本负责生产原装车三个编组(24辆),提供零件六个编组(48辆),剩下的51个编组(408辆)由日本提供技术,在国内由四方进行制造。"
So, Si Fang produces 51 groups at 4.5 billion, we can see the price for each group is 88.24 million.
And we may assume Japan produce all the rest 9 groups at the same price, the price may be: 9x88.24million=794.1million
(Of course, Costs in Japan might be higher, but it could not be too high, due to the scale effect.By the way, anybody know the exact manufacturing costs for Japanese companies? I dont know Japanese, so I can not get the original information.)
Roughly speaking, Chinese pay japan for the technology transferring for 6-0.7941 billion=5.2059billion
right?
Is this too expensive?
And, How about the tech transferring fees for France and Canada?
Maybe my calculation above is too simple, too naiive. Could u give me the reasonable one? Thanks first.
qn 3:
The highlight of this bidding, is the "Technology Transferring".
So China government got almost the same Technologies from three(or two) countries,right?
For what? Promte competition among Chinese Companies? Or just for fun?
Is that funny? Chinese people got so much money for such tremendous duplication?
Looking forward to answers.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
😭合同签约了,这次给日方下注的官方正式数字如下: 你克我服 字489 2004-10-22 02:49:51
其实用订单扶持拉拢亲华派的势力还是很好的 思考得人 字188 2004-10-22 22:11:58
🤔政治经济常识?我不懂。 snowbean 字973 2004-10-23 02:07:05
Is Chinese Government stupid ?
我个人的看法而已,供参考 你克我服 字1894 2004-10-22 19:07:57
有道理。克兄,京沪高铁如抛开政治因素,是否是用日本的较好? iceberg 字0 2004-10-22 20:26:19
当然不是唯一的选择。不过是个重要的选择 你克我服 字435 2004-10-23 06:58:56
thank you. iceberg 字0 2004-10-23 11:51:17