主题:【原创】他说我和方舟子私仇 -- 玉垒关2
从这篇文章,不能不看出,方舟子,到底站在哪一边的。
此外,非常有趣的是,
请看钱学森的原文
Do you owe your allegiance to Communist China?”
“I do not,” Tsien replied.
“To whom do you owe allegiance?”
“I owe allegiance to the people of China.”
“Do you owe your allegiance to Communist China?”
“I do not,” Tsien replied.
“To whom do you owe allegiance?”
“I owe allegiance to the people of China.”
Del Guercio sparred with Tsien for a moment and then demanded: “In the event of a conflict between this country and Red China, would you fight against Red China for the United States?”
Tsien parried. The situation had not presented itself. There was no such war. Again, Tsien’s lawyer protested. His client would need time to think about such a question.
“We will wait here six months,” Del Guercio snapped.
But Tsien volunteered that it would take only moments. The room fell silent. Five minutes ticked by.
Finally, Tsien said, “I can’t answer the question now.”
“You can’t or won’t answer the question now?”
“I can — c-a-n — answer the question now,” replied Tsien, stung, “and the answer is as follows: I have already said that my essential allegiance is to the people of China, and if the war between the United States and Communist China is for the good of the people of China, which I think is very likely to be, so then I will fight on the side of the United States. No question about that.”
“But you will make the decision first? You will determine whether it is for the good of the Chinese people?” Del Guercio asked.
“That decision, yes, I would make.”
“You will not permit the Government of the United States to make that decision for you?”
“No, certainly not.”
方舟子断章取义,曲解原文的本事,比他打假的本事更要高吧?
真的,和装的,自己可能都不自知。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂不同意美国是“故意”炸的=他觉得炸得有理? 4 njyd 字110 2011-10-22 10:10:46
🙂方舟子眼中的伊拉克战争 13 玉垒关2 字2557 2010-09-30 00:17:20
🙂你已经多次引用钱学森的这篇“听证会”问题回答 9 不远攸高 字527 2010-09-30 05:26:59
🙂钱学森的原话
🙂文抄公 leqian 字732 2010-09-30 05:11:25
🙂把这段对话的原始出处的全文贴出来就更好玩 上学不迟到 字65 2010-10-02 02:50:35
🙂找到他自己说的话 夏至欧锦 字34 2010-09-29 23:45:31
🙂【整理】缺钱,那就献花 9 迷途笨狼 字6160 2010-09-29 18:14:03