主题：自动化的迷思 -- 晨枫
共:💬108 🌺816 🌵2
复 自动化的迷思
Many economists are encouraged by history and think the gains eventually will outweigh the losses. But even they have doubts.
"What's different this time is that digital technologies show up in every corner of the economy," says McAfee, a self-described "digital optimist." ''Your tablet (computer) is just two or three years old, and it's already taken over our lives."
AP IMPACT: Recession, tech kill middle-class job
一共三部分，这是第一篇，还有后续。
美国终于有人能够面对问题的本质，工作不是被中国印度夺走的，以正视听。
"The effect of (technology) on white-collar jobs is huge, but it's not obvious," says MIT's McAfee. Companies "don't put out a press release saying we're not hiring again because of machines."
Technological innovations have been throwing people out of jobs for centuries. But they eventually created more work, and greater wealth, than they destroyed. Ford, the author and software engineer, thinks there is reason to believe that this time will be different. He sees virtually no end to the inroads of computers into the workplace. Eventually, he says, software will threaten the livelihoods of doctors, lawyers and other highly skilled professionals.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂以前只看你谈时政，没注意啊。这贴把科技，生产力，社会， 益者三友 字86 2013-01-26 14:14:38
🙂下次应该搞个专栏“控制工作者谈时政” 达雅 字56 2013-01-26 19:46:24
🙂说得很好，生产力增长了，需要人的关系也要适当变动 鸿乾 字310 2013-01-24 20:35:34
🙂这个评论是我看过最说明问题的
🙂Practically human: Can smart 川普 字669 2013-01-24 01:31:59
🙂楼主对自动化是不是太悲观了？ 7 自以为是 字1735 2013-01-23 22:49:03
🙂我对自动化不悲观 13 晨枫 字422 2013-01-23 23:27:26
🙂确实不省人力资源 1 土泡泡 字598 2013-01-23 12:45:52