主题:”老乐“不认为“洗衣粉”当年骗了美大多数人——他是不是在撒谎 -- 凤兮凤兮
您这是质疑“伊拉克调查小组”向美国国会的报告呢还是质疑国会的愚蠢?
你所举的原帖分明写的是“化学武器残余物”。
从知乎上找到一个2009年伊拉克提交的初次申报的报道:
NTI(防止大规模杀伤性武器的机构)网站的文章:India Completes Chemical Weapons Disposal; Iraq Declares Stockpile:
"Iraq submitted its initial declaration on 12 March 2009, and has declared two bunkers with filled and unfilled chemical weapons munitions, some precursors, as well as five former chemical weapons production facilities," Pfirter said last week.“
Iraq's history with chemical weapons is well known. The Hussein regime developed blister and nerve agents, and then used them against Iran and Iraqi Kurds in the 1980s. Tens of thousands of munitions and nearly 700 metric tons of warfare materials were destroyed in the years after the first Gulf War, but suspicions in Washington persisted that Baghdad had not fully dismantled its arsenal, according to the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
The U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified partly on the threat posed by the regime's alleged WMD activities. No indications of existing unconventional weapons operations were found after the war (see GSN, March 20). Iraq joined the Chemical Weapons Convention earlier this year
The declaration contained no surprises, OPCW spokesman Michael Luhan indicated. The production facilities were "put out of commission" by airstrikes during the 1991 conflict, while U.N. personnel afterward secured the chemical munitions in the bunkers, he said.
"These are legacy weapons, remnants," Luhan told Global Security Newswire today. He declined to discuss how many weapons were stored in the bunkers or what materials they contained. The weapons are not believed to be in a usable state.“
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂2018年3月,禁化武组织祝贺伊拉克销毁化学武器 1 流浪肥猫 字663 2022-12-15 04:51:07
🙂那只是能制造化武的原材料,不是化武。老梗了,不是救命稻草 3 凤兮凤兮 字412 2022-12-15 05:00:38
🙂您这是质疑禁化武组织的声明还是推翻新华社的翻译呢? 1 流浪肥猫 字327 2022-12-15 05:17:41
🙂您这是质疑“伊拉克调查小组”向国会的报告呢还是质疑国会的愚蠢
🙂联合国下属的禁化武组织不信,信美国一个民间智库? 2 流浪肥猫 字136 2022-12-15 10:58:16
🙂美国中央情报局领导的“伊拉克调查小组”背叛了美国? 1 凤兮凤兮 字109 2022-12-15 11:03:20
🙂你大概连人家写的什么都没看懂吧? 3 流浪肥猫 字86 2022-12-15 11:09:04
🙂你大概连“化学武器残余物”都不屑于看了吧? 4 凤兮凤兮 字58 2022-12-15 11:36:22