主题：国债负利率的日本，越借钱政府赚得越多，当然不怕花钱 -- forger

墨虎's fallacy posts is about a subject of worth of tons of books;

长远看, CNY is much more bullish than JPY, for the obvious reasons;

the too obvious things are often likely fallacies;

"长远看, CNY more bullish vs JPY", can you provide a operational model for chairman X based on that kind of people's daily stuff?

can you as a trader, investor, a business man make decisions based on that stuff?

how 长远 is 长远? if we can't define or quantify it, then it is useless, fallacies suspicious, because it does not provide any new information, and therefore valueless;

1.

as said, TG picked up soviet union version of Marxism as their "logic model" at right time, right place, and it worked out hugely well for TG.

Marxism, Lennism actually "correctly" exposed the disequilibrium nature of capitalism, so did Keynesian & alike other white economists, human system as an open dissipative system is fundamentally unstable, part of reasons human brain consumes most of human system's energy in a struggle to deal with this inherent volatility, as an individual or as a group;

still, in retrospect, Marxism, Lennism are more likely a fallacy ideology, because it did really contribute any new information to the humanity, its 砸烂旧世界 solution to fix the problem of capitalism is obviously more harmful than helpful to human system as a whole;

china in long term will more likely do better than japan, and neither of them will fall apart as "volatility" may have suggested, and china's survival and growth in future will be related less and less to Marxism & Lennism.

and again, 长远看 is a fallacy, "china will do well" is a fallacy as well, because it does not tell you any information about "china will do well relative to whom"? and how to get there? at all.

2.

how to get there? it looks like US is trying to make this AI economy fly off

changshou：几何直观地介绍广义相对论的时空以及大爆炸模型 （0） 2013-07-03 19:23:56

a very good series

柯西超曲面,"全局双曲的时空 存在整体的坐标时间" [ 晓兵 ] 于:2013-07-03 19:23:56 复:3674028

物理"因果结构存在"=柯西超曲面=全局双曲的时空 存在整体的坐标时间"

"如果有一个 这样的整体的坐标时间 我们就有无穷多的其他的 整体的坐标时间。这是因为我们可以把观察者们的世界线 作连续的形变（只要形变幅度不大 就仍然是类时的）。

这类时空 有整体的坐标时间和 对应于（该坐标时间的）某一时刻的空间部分（柯西超曲面）。于是 我们可以说 全局双曲的时空是 柯西超曲面随坐标时间演化而成的。"

that tells us, as an individual or a group, we all get a share of this 柯西超曲面 related volatility, period;

and how to reduce that volatility consumption of our energy, is often critical, or 出身未捷身先死 长使英雄泪满襟;

in the past of not too long ago, human beings used to murder each other in tons of blood to figure out whose political ideology religious view are fallacies, not any more, now human social science 证伪 process is much less bloody, more of financial market 证伪, then you have 2008 black hole almost sucked in the whole world of capitalism.

so, let's try AI 证伪, part of why AI economy now.

in terms of social physics, 柯西超曲面 may exist, but it currently cost society tons of money in trying figuring this "柯西超曲面度量" thing out;

and making things worse, even GR model may have underestimated the "volatility cost" in finding 柯西超曲面, in using its Riemann manifold 二次形 vs finsler manifold, 芬斯勒几何是一种没有二次型限制的黎曼几何，与变分学密切相关, Finsler度量是没有二次型限制的riemann度量, etc

3.

partially, "volatility cost" is associated with 战争是政治的继续 model, since capitalist economics can't handle a dissipative system of today's national and world economy, so Ben/Fed actually played 政治 role as Fed is part of uncle sam's 国家机器 anyway, and with that, Ben/Fed bailed out uncle sam out of its 2008 black hole.

obviously, chairman X is trying using TGchina's 国家机器 to handle this likely coming bear market for china as well.

泥轰, uncle sam vs Tgchina is a complicated game, what I care as an individual is the modeling methodology part of it, and hopefully with a good model, we can guess better about each of three players, their strategies, and the outcome of the game;

1.

比特币 "case study"

@华尔街叛徒：资本市场一个最根本的问题就是“神马是无风险资产”。原来一直共同假设是美债，刚到Lehman的时候我很天真地质疑然后被无情嘲笑。现在大家逐渐开始接受这个质疑了，至少在理论层面上。基础货币和信用货币的分离可以一劳永逸解决这个问题。这才是比特币这个社会试验的根本价值，相对而言其

回复@athosliu:well said, 战争是政治的继续, including 货币的战争, 比特币 is a great try as 基础货币和信用货币的分离, & that is its fundamental weakness as well, because 基础货币和信用货币的分离 is a fantancy only, without 政府

回复@athosliu:政治 is greatly overlooked by capital market, what is Ben FED QE? it started as 政治 game, it is still a 政治 game, & awkwardly played out by finaniciers made politicians, those Fed guys; VS. china: TG=politicians made financiers playing a finance game, same trick

回复@athosliu:政治家 is always the last resort to bail a society out of its crisis mode, US conventional 政治家 were fxxked up by its 公知 system, then you have FED to take over & play 政治家 without constraint of 公知 system, 政治家 as 战争家 of a nation, 本质上不受约束, 最终力

2.

I will come back with more comments, but for now, TG seems to have over played and over leveraged on its 政治 card, vs uncle sam, more of a more well rounded player, playing a portfolio of cards, and yes, there are tons of other factors, other than playing model/strategy part;

TG, and Chinese as a nation, needs to learn how to play a portfolio of cards, and yes, you have to have a bounce of cards in your hand first, other than 政治 card.

1.

O "得道多助 失道寡助":1949, TG 得罪了老美 花1 晓兵 字10558 2013-09-08 07:11:01

．．．．．．O 再谈TPP 花17 本嘉明 字1425 2013-09-08 07:44:41

．．．．．．．O a TG made 单色谱世界 花2 晓兵 字3189 2013-09-08 22:01:27

．．．．．．．O TPP所代表的“新美国主义”=新进化论, kind of 花1 晓兵 字422 2013-09-08 08:25:05

．．．．．．．．O 有效配置是否只是老美的借口 花1 yaojiajun 字16 2013-09-08 08:33:17

．．．．．．．．．O 一旦得手, 往死里打, 给全世界当典型 花1 晓兵 字352 2013-09-08 08:48:17

．．．．．．．．．O 经济战也是心理战 yaojiajun 字36 2013-09-08 09:04:48

．．．．．．．．．O 四平八稳一点 花4 本嘉明 字336 2013-09-08 09:31:42

．．．．．．．．．O 磨洋工=最好,最不可行 花1 晓兵 字673 2013-09-08 12:14:59

2.

as I posted zillions times, the biggest risk of TGchina's authoritarian system is

1) information incomplete

to be brief, market's algo is almost like that brain neuron network algo, it is almost like a general relativity theory model

it is non linear, therefore every 与环境因素有关的开关 has to be traded as one of "神经网络中高达10的15次方个突触的所有具体连接" by market as a collective information processing system, to figure out 测地线最小作用路径 for the system to survive and grow;

obviously, this means any local 伟光正=BS, and there is no an universal global 伟光正, period, or there is one, but we have not figured out yet, like GOD, it is somewhere, ever changing, "phantom of opera".

in physics, similar ising model of 3 dimensions is still challenging humanity's science, we can't figure out an analytical solution for that, we have to go market's way, or statistics physics

2) a decision making model with potentially a lot of fallacies

3)

those are present operational risks to TG, as to the long term risk of brain development BS stuff, nobody cares for now;

but operational risk could hurt you, baby

3.

white 一旦得手, 往死里打TG, 给全世界当典型

this is real, not a fallacy;

what to do?

my guess:

1) X knows all the above 1& 2, in the sense, that he knows china needs a fundamental market reform, and a political system reform as well, and you have to do both in a comprehensive way;

2) if he does that, he may better do it all together with a grand deal of getting united with 李光耀 连斩 as a 中国邦联

3) X discussed that with his red gen II club memembers

and they all said, fxxk 李光耀 连斩

4) X gambles that he can model after M's model with modern revisions of whatever, and survive the risk of "white 一旦得手, 往死里打TG", then he will be ok

4.

again, guess:

1) jpy to uncle sam/white: let all jump in shorting TGchina, yesterday;

2) uncle same to jpy: take it slow, no hurry, my fed QEed economy still sucks, your ABE QEed economy is even worse, let play this political ideological fuss with uncle X, with some military smokes, that way, we keep cooking this low but persistent volatility to stress out uncle X and those yellow Asian nearby, that way, they will do more business with USD & JPY, less with CNY;

3) uncle sam to jpy: besides, TG is still largely supported by PLA, CAS, and almost "all" of Chinese people, a very few 公知 folks still left, but barely breathing, so if you attack TG, you are attacking Chinese people, Chinese nation, you should never do that, and you can't do it anyway

4)

jpy to uncle sam: ok, got you, let's play money game, sucking it out of TGchina

5.

meantime, the world is still "life goes on"

"神经网络中高达10的15次方个突触的所有具体连接"

obviously, in the emerging AI economy powered by uncle sam's goog, fb, msft, orcl, etc, every 连接 is a trade, a business, in a AI filtered & much more effective & efficient new way of economic transactions;

with that human labor productivity could have a quantum jump, 生产可能性边界 to be expanded both internally and externatlly, human capitalism to grow out of deflation trap, into a complete new phase;

6.

where would USD & JPY be in that new world? that is likely what uncle sam cares most, most likely, and JPY is figuring that out too;

as to X & his red gen II club buddies, there is not much you can do with them anyway, as long as Chinese people like them, and as long as we can buy low from & sell high to china, long live chairman X, his "事业正在上升阶段", uncle sam told jpy before going to Beijing?

this old white guy speaks very condescendingly in talking to one yellow guy about the other yellow guy, it is almost insulting to all Asian yellow folks, period.

but again, once you yellows are divided, and even more divided in subgroup of Chinese yellows, what do you get from white wolf/gang of united ones?

they dump their BS into your mouth, ass, period, filling you up, sucking money out of you, period, and there is nothing else, kind of;

and it looks like white's self confidence, esteem, ego are coming back, quite bit.

------------

[PDF]

Neural networks in neuroscience - Universidad de Granada

www.ugr.es/~sam/index_archivos/Overview_neural_nets.pdf

by S Johnson - Related articles

Long axons, ending in terminals which form synapses to the dendrites which ... considered was basically an Ising model in which the spins were substituted for “ ...

Principles of Neural Coding - Page 545 - Google Books Result

books.google.com/books?isbn=1439853304

Rodrigo Quian Quiroga, Stefano Panzeri - 2013 - Medical

... all the above, we restricted the treatment to the simplest kind of kinetic Ising model, for pedagogical ... It describes synaptic and membrane potential dynamics.

Learning algorithm for a neural network with binary synapses ...

link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01307854

by H Khler - 1990 - Cited by 32 - Related articles

A learning mechanism for neural networks with binary synapses is defined and

again, I have posted zillions times on this subject. I think this is an important issue for the future development of Chinese society, worth tons of discussion & books, although it seems fewer and fewer people even care anymore, those who can afford, they send their children abroad, those who cannot afford, well, help your children out in whatever ways.

1.

" white" as 日本的"领导" was a result of a 心甘情愿 brainwashing of jpy by whites, started 200 years ago;

why 心甘情愿? because it is logical, and there is no logic other than that of white, I have posted zillion times here in this forum;

some mainland academic guys compared brainwashing of uncle sam vs that of TG

uncle sam "teaches" you "logic", then with that logic, you "naturally" come to the conclusions or points uncle sam wants you remember, and you do remember it most likely, because now you have studied very hard and well, and understood the "logic" well, really "got it", and you may be even able to teach it to others.

and we all know how uncle TG does his "brutal" brainwashing.

2.

影响中国人创新的重要文化障碍-----尊重的稀缺 花30 罗化生 字4046 2012-09-03 20:41:42

Personal attacks 花4 墨虎 字164 2013-09-30 22:15:34

．．O 同意。现代中国人普遍性的缺乏基本逻辑思维能力。 花1 Galleon 字0 2013-11-03 22:14:13

．．．O 什么是基本逻辑思维能力 草春200 字0 2013-11-03 23:13:23

．．．．O 能够识别语言中的各种fallacy 花3 墨虎 字335 2013-11-04 11:03:31

．．．．．O 非常同意。逻辑和哲学，是现代科学的基石， 花2 Galleon 字388 2013-11-05 14:16:24

．．．．．．O 哲学的培养是个艰辛的过程，无异于对一个大脑进行格式化 花1 捣江湖 字290 2013-11-06 03:57:48

．．．．．．．O 逻辑也不一定需要开课 Fuhrer 字315 2013-11-06 04:43:57

．．．．．．．．O 还是需要的，真研究起来还很复杂。中国人好像是做事说话好像 捣江湖 字208 2013-11-07 00:42:17

．．O 逻辑的稀缺其实是想象力的稀缺 花2 Fuhrer 字213 2013-10-14 10:23:40

．．．O 这个我觉得你总结反了，是逻辑的缺失，导致了想象力缺失。 花1 Galleon 字323 2013-11-05 14:03:38

．．．．O 说的对 Fuhrer 字173 2013-11-05 20:00:02

．．．O 信口开河，不知所谓 花1 草春200 字56 2013-11-03 23:16:47

3.

obviously, china as a nation is still "mentally or logically" confused, with all kinds of fallacies flying all over the places, such as "宪政" "军队党领导", 辩证法, etc

can any one write a solid AI based software with potential multiple commercial utilization values other than as a political "joke", based on those 辩证法? how do you teach young Chinese students of those 辩证法?

if you can't brainwash your own people well with your 辩证法, how do you export your "value system" to other Asian counties with your CNY to be their reserve currency on the way, and then QE them?

4.

before TG/china figures out a new set and "non-斜路" logic to replace those of white, here (from wiki) is the

List of fallacies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common misconceptions.

A fallacy is incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric resulting in a lack of validity, or more generally, a lack of soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies.

5.

basically, white "logic" has to be a "linear" one, even modern physics/math's all the "non-linear" models still carry a linear core;

if it is linear, then we are not too far away from meeting logic's requirement such as quantification.

an example, 宇宙真理, 伟光正,代表人民根本利益长远利益最大利益, 华夏正能量, etc, may be good propaganda stuff at people's daily level, they should not be part of X modelling for serious decision making at national level, they are essentially non-linear, hard to quantify among their other "logic" issues.

even as propaganda stuff, they are loosing its effectiveness apparently, & TG needs to figure out how to compete with uncle sam's logic based brainwashing.

6.

so, an international QE is not just a navy aircraft carrier powered unloading of whatever made in china into ashore of nearby Asian countries, such as those 高铁换大米 alike.

To QE other nations is not easy at all, that is one of reasons why it is so profitable.

Does X model have a long term & well integrated plan/strategy for china to grow and be eventually capable of colonizing other nations by tons of CNY flood?

if not, then you have to colonize your own people.

i will come back with more comments, for now:

1.

夕曦：【原创】教育探索（六）—大脑神经网络是如何形成的 2012-01-31 20:20:16

DNA里携带的是一种分形的自组织规则。 [ 拿不准 ] 于:2012-01-31 20:20:16 复:3633311

这种规则中肯定有与环境因素有关的开关。

这也是形成多样型的基础。

2.

软银创始人孙正义：从终端与云端变化看未来30年

2013-12-04 13:12论坛虎嗅网

.

.

关键字：孙正义 云计算

　　在座的各位，大家好。我是来自软银的孙正义，请大家多多指教。

　　“向世界挑战”，这是我对我们公司的期望，今日聚集在此的诸位都就职于在世界市场活跃的企业，也都是很有抱负的人。最近，在安倍经济政策的影响下，日本的经济再次显现出了迎来成长期的态势，在刺激经济发展这个意义上，有许多的财政上的举措，也会有经济成长的战略规划，然而，利用一时的财政政策，却无法让经济成长的话，就没有意义。在这个意义上，日本经济的高速成长的时代，正是日本家电和汽车产业的创业者们开始大规模向世界进军的时代。在最近的20年里，日本经济增长长期停滞，还面临人口减少和少子化问题，进军世界是必要之举。

　　要么数码化，要么灭亡

　　现在的状况是：数字化之于许多人，并不是主动进行的，而是走投无路被逼进行的。

　　特别是最近，日本的家电产业在持续和赤字苦战。我认为，其原因就是数码化的动作太慢了。仅仅组装零件，就仅仅只是电子化。日本制造的硬件非常轻薄，故障率低，这是日本的传家手艺，这也面临数码化不足的问题。

　　要让软件和硬件融合，一定要活用云技术和大数据，也就一定要积极地进行数码化。

　　“向世界挑战”，我想将这个作为今日的主题，首先从我自身来说，今年我们软银会更进一步向世界挑战，我们已经开始着手了，收购美国的Sprint，我们也很不安，有很多意见分歧、也有很多曲折，虽然收购价稍高，但最终还是收购完成了。

　　我们是销售额排世界前三的企业，至今也在日本排第2、第3。我们引以为傲的服务排在第3位，整个集团服务的用户数和销售额排在第2，但是，在国内第2第3先暂放一边，重要的是在世界排第3，用户数在全球的数量远远超多docomo，逼近美国第一的威讯。

　　这么看来，平时与我们做交易或者今后有此打算的各位，软银将Sprint收归旗下，能得到什么呢?虽说软银在全世界的据点并不少，但是Sprint在全世界有30个据点，用网络连接了165个国家。对于在世界市场活跃、或是今后有此计划的各位来说，软银·Sprint联军可以帮助你们，将美国排名第三的Sprint收于麾下，我们的联军可以在全世界大展宏图。

　　虽有挑战，但定能打开未来之门。没有任何挑战就能面对未来的情况，要么是前人栽树后人乘凉，要么纯属运气，恐怕也不能长久。但是主动持续挑战着地各位，是自己开拓自己的未来的，我认为一定能取得好的结果。

　　我差不多在3年多以前，提出了软银的“30年愿景”。第一次提出“30年愿景”的时候，是创业之时，我第一次举行公司早会，除我之外公司员工只有2人，在早会上我差不多说了半个小时的未来愿景，两个员工都睁着眼睛听，觉得自己身在一个奇怪的公司，两星期过去后2个人就辞职了。

　　进行长长的演讲述说公司愿景，会给员工留下心理阴影，所以我把愿景封印在心里了。创业经过了30年，我再一次把这个问题摆在员工面前，把至今以来的30年愿景述说出来。

　　终端之变：单片机的晶体管数量在2018年会超过人脑

　　一开始，我迷茫于“30年之后会怎样”这个问题，然而越是迷茫就越要往远处看，就越能看清洪流中的未来。我们考虑长远一些，彻底考虑一下300年后的人类的生活状态、社会、技术的进化，大约花费了一年聚集国内外的才智来考虑这个问题，今天大致说一下其中的一部分。

　　单片机是晶体管做成的，晶体管靠近和分开，形成了电流，脑细胞也是神经细胞靠近分开、进行记忆与思考，也就是2进制，用微弱的电流记忆和思考。晶体管也是二进制，脑细胞和电脑芯片完全是同一理论。由此推断，在大约20年前，人类的脑细胞数量是30亿个，按照二进制就有300亿个组合。300亿个，单片机里的晶体管数量何时能超越这个数，如果我们算一下的话，答案是2018年。

　　按照摩尔定律，机能一定会不断进化。而人类的细胞从4000年前到现在就没变过。

　　从现在起2000年后脑细胞的数量也不会变，而单片机的晶体管数量在2018年会超过人脑，我们再想想30年后会怎样，2018年之后的30年后、更进一步，想想300年后。300年后，就是10的60次方倍，远远超过脑细胞的数量，至今为止人类是地球上用脑细胞工作的生命体中数量最多的，而拥有超越人类机能之力的，是单片机。

　　晶体管蕴含许多可能性

　　我们认为烦恼、想象、创造是人类的特权，电脑今后也将拥有自学能力，电脑自己编程的时代将会到来，今后的世界将像是科幻小说一样，脑构造计算机一定会诞生，能比人类更加敏锐地洞察和发明，搭载这种计算机的机器人会超过人类，不与其共存就没有未来，我相信人类与优秀的机器人能够幸福地共存。

　　人类目前认为不可能而放弃的领域，像灾害的救助、看护、医疗、教育等等，都可以由搭载脑构造计算机的机器人来帮助。

　　在从事通信事业的软银看来，优秀的电脑无线连接网络，通过芯片和人类进行脑内交流，只需在脑中思想就能与对方通信，就如同传心术一样。

　　30年前，手机还没有出现的时候，我就想到过像如今的智能机一样，平时随身携带的机器，最近的可穿戴设备，如手表、眼镜也相继出现了。

　　另外，医疗也会大大进步，平均寿命200岁的时代终将到来，300年前人类的平均寿命是35岁，大多数人因为战争和疾病早早地死亡。300年后人类的平均寿命是200岁，70~80岁都会被说年轻，未来越想象越觉得接近科幻小说，充满哲学、宗教等等争论的话题。

　　然而一边想象着300年后的世界，一边烦恼之后，再次考虑“30年后”这个话题，会觉得基本上是无聊而理所当然的世界。会让人觉得“这样的程度是理所当然的”，讨论300年后搭载脑构造计算机的机器人的时候，人们的意见多种多样，30年后的事与之比起来似乎太平常、引不起议论，但关键问题就在这理所当然的30年后。

　　首先是“信息大爆炸”，比如，我们想象一下30年后的iPhone会如何，与现在同样价格的CPU的能力大约会是现在的100万倍。

　　虽然不知到那时候，iPhone还存不存在，但30年后的智能机平均的记忆容量会是现在的100万倍，通信速度是300万倍。

　　100万倍是什么概念呢，那是装入了是人类大脑10万倍的晶体管。

　　2018年以后电脑会超过人脑，30年后就是远远超过，这样的话，就能够放进5000亿首歌曲、3.5亿年份的报纸。这样的“超级智能机”今后将会出现，这样的终端本地的处理能力已经如此，云端会如何呢?这又完全不一样了，通信速度达到现在的300万倍的话，本地和云端之间的连接速度几乎可以忽略不计，无限大的云端将把地球大大拓宽，也会改变人们的生活方式。

　　云会成为人类最大的资产

　　所有的一切都会成为生活记录，被保存在云端。 “实时翻译眼镜” 30年前就取得了专利，当然远在谷歌眼镜之前，今后的云技术中，在通信的瞬间完成自动翻译会变成理所当然的事。教育当然也会大大进化，全世界的孩子能与世界各地的孩子说话、语言不通也能自动翻译。医疗也会发展到高水平，无论你是住在孤岛还是住在沙漠，也能瞬间接受世界最尖端的医疗服务。工作方式也会进化，能瞬间连接许多东西，生产效率大大提高……云会成为人类最大的资产。

　　移动设备的流行仅仅只是一个开始

　　软银也开始将云技术作为最大资产而活用起来，云和大数据相混合，能形成更加有益的形式，为市场服务、解决问题。软银首先从自己开始，活用大数据，解决自身的问题。首先改善信号，为了更好服务软银的用户，我们让信号更良好，建立更有效率的基站。

　　我们做了一件世界首创的事，独立花费了1个月时间，收集了7.5件的数据，数据从智能机App上获得并分析，用户网络的改善。用户在何处、何时、几次接入网络、连上了没有……我们进行了种种分析，也分析了竞争对手的用户的连接状态。这是世界首次，人们在哪个店里会进行怎样的行动、周五的18点到周日的10点都干了什么……一切都用数据进行分析。

　　我认为这样才能进行真正的改善，才能分析哪里有问题，障碍在哪里。举个例子，我们常在IT杂志上看到“调查了200个地方”“问了1000个人”，然后进行分析，但从没看过分析7.5亿人的杂志，因为这样很花钱，也没有相应的技术。Docomo的top2机型现在有多少连接上了，au的哪个机型连接率不好，我们比他们都清楚，这为我们改善通信服务帮了大忙，能堂堂正正地在电视广告里说“我们改善了信号”。再卖给别人之前自己先试试，能不能真的派上用场，这是软银的文化。把时下流行的概念比如云比如大数据先自己彻底活用，让我们的服务改善真的具备科学的数据分析背景，才能用有限的设备投资与别人竞争。

　　另一个活用大数据的例子，就是我们之前就开始做的，用户能不能实际体会到信号改善，我们通过分析推特的大数据来把握。

　　软银在工作方式上也配合云技术，率先进行了改变。iPhone推出至今已有4、5年了，我们给全部公司员工都配了一台，iPad出来的时候也给所有人配了，全员可以随身携带、连接云端，利益增长并不是偶然的事，对于未来的云，不活用iPhone是不行的，我们无论在何时何地都能进行各种各样的工作，邮件也通过Gmail Cloud化了，各种各样的报告也Cloud化了。

　　不仅仅是我们，和我们合作的企业也在活用这些。JR上配了7000台iPad mini，无论何时何地都能阅读喜爱的内容，医药公司利用视频提供医生的情报、misawa home(房地产公司)利用iPad进行工程管理、三和shutter也在工作中引入了1400台iPad，利用视频等手段，让人们能实际体验闸门开关的速度。

　　软银公司内已经实行无纸化，也不用打印机，除了契约性文件和向政府提供的文件，已经全面无纸化了，开会也是用视频介绍，公司内有专门制作视频的团队，presentation的方式也改变了。利用Google Apps在世界各处商谈……

　　向世界挑战，我们看见了新的风景，是不挑战则见不到的风景。今后让我们继续我们的征程，正在积极进行数码化的企业，让我们继续挑战信息的革命，世界的工作方式也会发生大的变革。

　　为什么要行动呢?只因这是为人们提供幸福而不得不进行的事。

　　这就是我今天的演讲。

原文出自【比特网】，转载请保留原文链接：http://cloud.chinabyte.com/news/193/12795193.shtml