主题：【文摘】中国10次拒绝英国交涉 明日将处死英国毒贩 -- 真理
明天是中国依法处决英国毒贩阿克毛的日子。英国在最后时刻展开了与中国的“疯狂谈判”。于27日赶赴中国的阿克毛家人又是要向中国领导人递交请求书，又是要向中国人大提交申请，还要申请中国最高法院复审。英国驻华大使也在一天前前往新疆探监。配合这些行动的是英国媒体在本土对阿克毛“悲情”的渲染。
北京大学国际关系学院副院长贾庆国对《环球时报》表示，西方在像赖昌星案这样的事情上和中国打交道时，常常以三权分立和司法独立作为理由，但在涉及自己公民时，做的却是让中国政府干预司法独立的事。
新疆是注射死刑还是枪毙啊？
事情到这地步，如果放了阿克毛，丫回到英国肯定反咬是冤狱。
他的家人做这样的努力是合法也是应该的，英国政府就太过份了。
一个邪恶的看法：如果只是他的家人在求情，说不定中国还会有所松动，英国政府的做法是在他棺材上钉牢了钉子。
是不是说明中国外交战略的一些变化？
必须杀，唯一可以探讨的问题是选择注射还是枪毙，哪一种更人道一点而已。外国人在抓中国毒贩时也没客气过。
寄希望于主席赦免？开什么玩笑！？对中国司法运作程序严重无知，把宝贵的二审机会和高法复核给的时间都浪费掉了。这个无知不光是其亲友，而且最主要的是英国使领馆人员和法律界，都出些什么歪点子。
否则有法不依的帽子是扣定了的
又是老掉牙地借死刑人数恶心中国政府。他们所谓mental disorder借口简直可笑，这厮五十多，当过出租车公司的管理人员，结婚生子，哪样也没落下， 独立完成了签证，订票等等一系列长途旅行程序，能不正常到哪里去？我国的携毒死刑线是50克， 这人的行李里有4000克，既然做得出，就要承担后果，叽叽歪歪扮无辜还不是想逃脱责任，可惜这是在中国， 没多少人理那一套。
这个合法么？
大声喊不让见这个不让见那个，逼得最后不得不见。 其实，这种呼吁未尝不是土共对内喊话。
在telegraph上有人威胁说如果不放人就要中国好看,说这话的人还是教会的,我现在还真有点害怕英国人,怕他不来真的光叫唤.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/georgepitcher/100020842/china-must-spare-akmal-shaikh-or-face-serious-consequences/
George Pitcher is Religion Editor of Telegraph Media. He is an Anglican priest and serves his ministry at St Bride's, Fleet Street, in London – the "journalists' church
China must spare Akmal Shaikh or face serious consequences
By George Pitcher UK Last updated: December 28th, 2009
97 Comments Comment on this article
In a little under eight hours of writing this, at 2.30 in the morning of our fifth day of Christmas,the People’s Republic of China will execute the British subject, Akmal Shaikh, unless a last plea for clemency succeeds.
Mr Shaikh is so obviously mentally ill, so clearly had no grasp of what he was doing when he was caught acting as a drug-mule by the Chinese authorities and was so clearly incapable of conducting any meaningful self-representation at his trial that the lethal injection or bullet in the back of the head he will receive in a few hours will not only be just another hideous Chinese execution, but also a disgusting and reprehensible miscarriage of justice.
Mr Shaikh’s death doubtless will be of little consequence to the Chinese authorities, who put some 1,700 people to death during the past year alone. The scale of this judicial murdering machine is difficult to grasp and even puts the United States to shame.
But Mr Shaikh is a British citizen and the first EU national to be executed in China for half a century. That means our Government should have some influence to bring to bear for once on China’s barbaric judicial practice.
We are long past gunboat diplomacy. But if China goes ahead with the execution of Mr Shaikh, the EU must condemn the Chinese government in the strongest possible terms and impose trade sanctions that are significant and hurtful, until China brings its legislature into line with European criminal sentencing.
China is the world’s third largest economy and aspires to take a respectable place on the international stage and in global trade. Beijing must know, tonight and unequivocally, that putting to death a mentally ill man in possession of a British passport is no way to go about its civilising aspirations. It must spare Mr